Advertisement
MURGF vs PINXY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MURGF is a StrongBuy and PINXY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MURGF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePINXY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- MURGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PINXY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MURGF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PINXY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MURGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- PINXY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
Price Growth
MURGF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +3.30% price change this week, while PINXY (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -0.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.76%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Property/Casualty Insurance (-0.74% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
| MURGF | PINXY | MURGF / PINXY | |
| Capitalization | 52B | 34.5B | 151% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.950 | 29.977 | 107% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.71 | 5.01 | 293% |
| Revenue | 70.3B | 615B | 11% |
| Total Cash | 5.82B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 4.76B | N/A | - |
MURGF | PINXY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 75 Overvalued | 15 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 4 | 4 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 17 | 70 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PINXY's Valuation (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MURGF (75). This means that PINXY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MURGF’s over the last 12 months.
PINXY's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as MURGF (4). This means that PINXY’s stock grew similarly to MURGF’s over the last 12 months.
MURGF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as PINXY (100). This means that MURGF’s stock grew similarly to PINXY’s over the last 12 months.
PINXY's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as MURGF (46). This means that PINXY’s stock grew similarly to MURGF’s over the last 12 months.
MURGF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PINXY (70). This means that MURGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PINXY’s over the last 12 months.
| MURGF | PINXY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 71% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 65% | 5 days ago 8% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 72% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 60% | 5 days ago 23% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 44% | 5 days ago 23% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 58% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 28 days ago 52% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 35% | 5 days ago 26% |
Advertisement
MURGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MURGF has been loosely correlated with SSREY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MURGF jumps, then SSREY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MURGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MURGF | 100% | +0.77% | ||
| SSREY - MURGF | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.29% | ||
| HVRRY - MURGF | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| MURGY - MURGF | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.15% | ||
| MSADF - MURGF | 12% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MSADY - MURGF | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.07% | ||
More | ||||
PINXY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PINXY and PPCCY have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PINXY and PPCCY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PINXY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PINXY | 100% | N/A | ||
| PPCCY - PINXY | 10% Poorly correlated | +5.14% | ||
| MURGF - PINXY | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.77% | ||
| MURGY - PINXY | 3% Poorly correlated | +0.15% | ||
| MSADY - PINXY | 1% Poorly correlated | +0.07% | ||
| IFCZF - PINXY | -0% Poorly correlated | +1.39% | ||
More | ||||