MULN
Price
$0.76
Change
-$0.15 (-16.67%)
Updated
Jun 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
34.07M
SVUHF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.01 (-14.29%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
6.67M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MULN vs SVUHF

Header iconMULN vs SVUHF Comparison
Open Charts MULN vs SVUHFBanner chart's image
Mullen Automotive
Price$0.76
Change-$0.15 (-16.67%)
Volume$46.3K
Capitalization34.07M
SRIVARU Holding
Price$0.06
Change-$0.01 (-14.29%)
Volume$71.8K
Capitalization6.67M
MULN vs SVUHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MULN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVUHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MULN vs. SVUHF commentary
Jun 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MULN is a Hold and SVUHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2025
Stock price -- (MULN: $1.33 vs. SVUHF: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: MULN and SVUHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MULN: 420% vs. SVUHF: 868%
Market capitalization -- MULN: $34.07M vs. SVUHF: $6.67M
MULN [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $34.07M. SVUHF’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $6.67M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $559.85B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $34.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MULN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSVUHF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MULN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SVUHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SVUHF is a better buy in the long-term than MULN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MULN’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVUHF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MULN’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SVUHF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SVUHF is a better buy in the short-term than MULN.

Price Growth

MULN (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а -33.50% price change this week, while SVUHF (@Motor Vehicles) price change was -11.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was +19.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.66%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (+19.00% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MULN($34.1M) has a higher market cap than SVUHF($6.67M). SVUHF (-96.026) and MULN (-100.000) have similar YTD gains .
MULNSVUHFMULN / SVUHF
Capitalization34.1M6.67M512%
EBITDA-686.05MN/A-
Gain YTD-100.000-96.026104%
P/E Ratio0.00N/A-
Revenue366KN/A-
Total Cash81.5MN/A-
Total Debt19MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MULN: Fundamental Ratings
MULN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
11
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
99
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MULNSVUHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MULN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVUHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
YHGJ0.760.03
+4.58%
Yunhong Green CTI Ltd
LEN106.423.01
+2.91%
Lennar Corp
CNL9.71-0.01
-0.10%
COLLECTIVE MINING LTD
PTEN6.35-0.09
-1.40%
Patterson-UTI Energy
NMM40.02-0.76
-1.86%
Navios Maritime Partners LP

MULN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MULN and TSLA have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MULN and TSLA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MULN
1D Price
Change %
MULN100%
+0.76%
TSLA - MULN
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
SVUHF - MULN
21%
Poorly correlated
+19.33%
CENN - MULN
20%
Poorly correlated
+8.28%
WKHS - MULN
16%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%
NWTN - MULN
16%
Poorly correlated
+19.32%
More

SVUHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SVUHF and MULN have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SVUHF and MULN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVUHF
1D Price
Change %
SVUHF100%
+19.33%
MULN - SVUHF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
VFS - SVUHF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.74%
ECDA - SVUHF
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.58%