MUFG
Price
$15.90
Change
+$0.56 (+3.65%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
183.6B
92 days until earnings call
WFC
Price
$77.10
Change
-$2.31 (-2.91%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
246.99B
57 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MUFG vs WFC

Header iconMUFG vs WFC Comparison
Open Charts MUFG vs WFCBanner chart's image
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group
Price$15.90
Change+$0.56 (+3.65%)
Volume$6.05M
Capitalization183.6B
Wells Fargo & Co
Price$77.10
Change-$2.31 (-2.91%)
Volume$15.38M
Capitalization246.99B
MUFG vs WFC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MUFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MUFG vs. WFC commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MUFG is a Hold and WFC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (MUFG: $15.90 vs. WFC: $77.10)
Brand notoriety: MUFG: Not notable vs. WFC: Notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MUFG: 165% vs. WFC: 86%
Market capitalization -- MUFG: $183.6B vs. WFC: $246.99B
MUFG [@Major Banks] is valued at $183.6B. WFC’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $246.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $798.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $133.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MUFG’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWFC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MUFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WFC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MUFG is a better buy in the long-term than WFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MUFG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WFC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MUFG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WFC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MUFG is a better buy in the short-term than WFC.

Price Growth

MUFG (@Major Banks) experienced а +9.20% price change this week, while WFC (@Major Banks) price change was -0.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +2.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

MUFG is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2025.

WFC is expected to report earnings on Oct 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+2.52% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WFC($247B) has a higher market cap than MUFG($184B). MUFG has higher P/E ratio than WFC: MUFG (14.67) vs WFC (13.25). MUFG YTD gains are higher at: 35.666 vs. WFC (11.565). WFC has less debt than MUFG: WFC (189B) vs MUFG (46.04T).
MUFGWFCMUFG / WFC
Capitalization184B247B74%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD35.66611.565308%
P/E Ratio14.6713.25111%
Revenue6.84TN/A-
Total CashN/A35.3B-
Total Debt46.04T189B24,361%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MUFG vs WFC: Fundamental Ratings
MUFG
WFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1670
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
912
SMR RATING
1..100
12
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4228
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2830
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WFC's Valuation (80) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MUFG (88). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

MUFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (12). This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

MUFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (2). This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

WFC's Price Growth Rating (28) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MUFG (42). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

MUFG's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (30). This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MUFGWFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MUFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPRY14.530.06
+0.41%
ARS Pharmaceuticals
HFT.X0.0865800.000241
+0.28%
Hashflow cryptocurrency
SSV.X9.022459-0.003605
-0.04%
ssv.network cryptocurrency
REP.X1.015374-0.008427
-0.82%
Augur cryptocurrency
GH58.88-1.48
-2.45%
Guardant Health

MUFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MUFG has been closely correlated with SMFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MUFG jumps, then SMFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MUFG
1D Price
Change %
MUFG100%
+3.65%
SMFG - MUFG
83%
Closely correlated
+2.27%
C - MUFG
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.85%
WFC - MUFG
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.91%
BAC - MUFG
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.61%
JPM - MUFG
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.25%
More

WFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WFC has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WFC jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WFC
1D Price
Change %
WFC100%
-2.91%
BAC - WFC
85%
Closely correlated
-1.61%
JPM - WFC
81%
Closely correlated
-1.25%
C - WFC
80%
Closely correlated
-1.85%
BK - WFC
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.27%
BCS - WFC
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.36%
More