MUFG
Price
$12.07
Change
+$0.57 (+4.96%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
87 days until earnings call
WFC
Price
$72.80
Change
+$0.03 (+0.04%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
61 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MUFG vs WFC

Header iconMUFG vs WFC Comparison
Open Charts MUFG vs WFCBanner chart's image
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group
Price$12.07
Change+$0.57 (+4.96%)
Volume$3.65M
CapitalizationN/A
Wells Fargo & Co
Price$72.80
Change+$0.03 (+0.04%)
Volume$13.65M
CapitalizationN/A
MUFG vs WFC Comparison Chart
Loading...
MUFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
WFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MUFG vs. WFC commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MUFG is a Hold and WFC is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (MUFG: $12.07 vs. WFC: $72.80)
Brand notoriety: MUFG: Not notable vs. WFC: Notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MUFG: 198% vs. WFC: 71%
Market capitalization -- MUFG: $116.09B vs. WFC: $203.96B
MUFG [@Major Banks] is valued at $116.09B. WFC’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $203.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MUFG’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWFC’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • MUFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WFC’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MUFG and WFC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MUFG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WFC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MUFG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MUFG is a better buy in the short-term than WFC.

Price Growth

MUFG (@Major Banks) experienced а +4.87% price change this week, while WFC (@Major Banks) price change was +4.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -1.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

MUFG is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2025.

WFC is expected to report earnings on Jan 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-1.38% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WFC($204B) has a higher market cap than MUFG($116B). WFC has higher P/E ratio than MUFG: WFC (11.93) vs MUFG (8.85). WFC YTD gains are higher at: 51.817 vs. MUFG (41.918). WFC has less debt than MUFG: WFC (219B) vs MUFG (48.64T). MUFG has higher revenues than WFC: MUFG (5.66T) vs WFC (82.6B).
MUFGWFCMUFG / WFC
Capitalization116B204B57%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD41.91851.81781%
P/E Ratio8.8511.9374%
Revenue5.66T82.6B6,851%
Total CashN/A33B-
Total Debt48.64T219B22,210%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MUFG vs WFC: Fundamental Ratings
MUFG
WFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2721
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
533
SMR RATING
1..100
12
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
445
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2420
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MUFG's Valuation (67) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (81). This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

MUFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (33). This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

MUFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (2). This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

WFC's Price Growth Rating (5) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MUFG (44). This means that WFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

WFC's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MUFG (24). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MUFGWFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MUFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
WFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

MUFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MUFG has been closely correlated with SMFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MUFG jumps, then SMFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MUFG
1D Price
Change %
MUFG100%
+4.96%
SMFG - MUFG
89%
Closely correlated
+2.88%
WFC - MUFG
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
C - MUFG
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.07%
BMO - MUFG
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
BAC - MUFG
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
More

WFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WFC has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WFC jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WFC
1D Price
Change %
WFC100%
+0.04%
BAC - WFC
78%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
JPM - WFC
71%
Closely correlated
+0.29%
C - WFC
67%
Closely correlated
-1.07%
NTB - WFC
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
CM - WFC
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
More