MUFG
Price
$18.52
Change
+$3.18 (+20.73%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
209.78B
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WFC
Price
$92.31
Change
+$12.42 (+15.55%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
285.36B
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MUFG vs WFC

Header iconMUFG vs WFC Comparison
Open Charts MUFG vs WFCBanner chart's image
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group
Price$18.52
Change+$3.18 (+20.73%)
Volume$4.02M
Capitalization209.78B
Wells Fargo & Co
Price$92.31
Change+$12.42 (+15.55%)
Volume$18.1M
Capitalization285.36B
MUFG vs WFC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MUFG vs. WFC commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MUFG is a Hold and WFC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (MUFG: $18.52 vs. WFC: $92.31)
Brand notoriety: MUFG: Not notable vs. WFC: Notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MUFG: 109% vs. WFC: 120%
Market capitalization -- MUFG: $209.78B vs. WFC: $285.48B
MUFG [@Major Banks] is valued at $209.78B. WFC’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $285.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $848.9B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $146.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MUFG’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWFC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MUFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MUFG is a better buy in the long-term than WFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MUFG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WFC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MUFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WFC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WFC is a better buy in the short-term than MUFG.

Price Growth

MUFG (@Major Banks) experienced а +2.04% price change this week, while WFC (@Major Banks) price change was +4.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +0.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

MUFG is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

WFC is expected to report earnings on Apr 14, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+0.71% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WFC($285B) has a higher market cap than MUFG($210B). MUFG has higher P/E ratio than WFC: MUFG (17.48) vs WFC (14.74). MUFG YTD gains are higher at: 16.772 vs. WFC (-0.998). WFC has less debt than MUFG: WFC (214B) vs MUFG (37.6T). MUFG has higher revenues than WFC: MUFG (6.77T) vs WFC (82.8B).
MUFGWFCMUFG / WFC
Capitalization210B285B74%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.772-0.998-1,681%
P/E Ratio17.4814.74119%
Revenue6.77T82.8B8,170%
Total CashN/A34.8B-
Total Debt37.6T214B17,568%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MUFG vs WFC: Fundamental Ratings
MUFG
WFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8464
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
910
SMR RATING
1..100
12
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4252
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2051
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5055

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WFC's Valuation (80) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MUFG (83). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

MUFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (10). This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

MUFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (2). This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

MUFG's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (52). This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

MUFG's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (51). This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MUFGWFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MUFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MDST27.620.36
+1.32%
Westwood Salient Enhanced Mid Inc ETF
CEFA39.060.09
+0.23%
Global X S&P Cthlc Vls Dvlpd ex-US ETF
IVE219.04N/A
N/A
iShares S&P 500 Value ETF
FHEQ31.11-0.31
-0.99%
Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF
TXUG24.89-0.40
-1.57%
Thornburg International Growth ETF

MUFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MUFG has been closely correlated with SMFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MUFG jumps, then SMFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MUFG
1D Price
Change %
MUFG100%
+1.54%
SMFG - MUFG
83%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
UBS - MUFG
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
BCS - MUFG
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
ING - MUFG
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.85%
C - MUFG
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.27%
More

WFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WFC has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WFC jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WFC
1D Price
Change %
WFC100%
+1.97%
BAC - WFC
86%
Closely correlated
+1.56%
C - WFC
79%
Closely correlated
+0.97%
JPM - WFC
75%
Closely correlated
+0.74%
EWBC - WFC
67%
Closely correlated
+0.87%
BK - WFC
67%
Closely correlated
+1.41%
More