MUFG
Price
$18.52
Change
+$3.18 (+20.73%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
199.95B
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SAN
Price
$12.23
Change
+$2.29 (+23.04%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
192.27B
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MUFG vs SAN

Header iconMUFG vs SAN Comparison
Open Charts MUFG vs SANBanner chart's image
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group
Price$18.52
Change+$3.18 (+20.73%)
Volume$4.02M
Capitalization199.95B
Banco Santander SA
Price$12.23
Change+$2.29 (+23.04%)
Volume$61.03M
Capitalization192.27B
MUFG vs SAN Comparison Chart in %
MUFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SAN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MUFG vs. SAN commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MUFG is a Hold and SAN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (MUFG: $18.24 vs. SAN: $13.06)
Brand notoriety: MUFG and SAN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MUFG: 68% vs. SAN: 97%
Market capitalization -- MUFG: $199.95B vs. SAN: $192.27B
MUFG [@Major Banks] is valued at $199.95B. SAN’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $192.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $830.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $145.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MUFG’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSAN’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MUFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SAN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MUFG and SAN are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MUFG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MUFG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SAN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SAN is a better buy in the short-term than MUFG.

Price Growth

MUFG (@Major Banks) experienced а +2.18% price change this week, while SAN (@Major Banks) price change was +3.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

MUFG is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

SAN is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+0.89% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MUFG($200B) and SAN($192B) have the same market capitalization . MUFG has higher P/E ratio than SAN: MUFG (17.20) vs SAN (13.05). MUFG YTD gains are higher at: 15.006 vs. SAN (11.338). SAN has less debt than MUFG: SAN (317B) vs MUFG (37.6T). MUFG has higher revenues than SAN: MUFG (6.77T) vs SAN (63.8B).
MUFGSANMUFG / SAN
Capitalization200B192B104%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD15.00611.338132%
P/E Ratio17.2013.05132%
Revenue6.77T63.8B10,603%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt37.6T317B11,860%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MUFG vs SAN: Fundamental Ratings
MUFG
SAN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8380
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
92
SMR RATING
1..100
12
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4238
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
209
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MUFG's Valuation (82) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SAN (85). This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to SAN’s over the last 12 months.

SAN's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MUFG (9). This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

MUFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SAN (2). This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to SAN’s over the last 12 months.

SAN's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MUFG (42). This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

SAN's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MUFG (20). This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MUFGSAN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MUFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SAN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UMDD29.060.73
+2.57%
ProShares UltraPro MidCap400
DIA494.035.00
+1.02%
SPDR® Dow Jones Industrial Avrg ETF Tr
SMIZ38.960.30
+0.78%
Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF
MODL48.130.32
+0.67%
VictoryShares WestEnd U.S. Sector ETF
MSFW32.54-0.86
-2.57%
Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay ETF

MUFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MUFG has been closely correlated with SMFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MUFG jumps, then SMFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MUFG
1D Price
Change %
MUFG100%
+1.05%
SMFG - MUFG
83%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
BCS - MUFG
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.84%
HSBC - MUFG
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.81%
UBS - MUFG
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.29%
WFC - MUFG
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.97%
More

SAN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAN has been closely correlated with BBVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAN jumps, then BBVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAN
1D Price
Change %
SAN100%
+2.43%
BBVA - SAN
81%
Closely correlated
+2.01%
BCS - SAN
75%
Closely correlated
+2.84%
ING - SAN
72%
Closely correlated
+3.27%
HSBC - SAN
66%
Closely correlated
+1.81%
MUFG - SAN
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.05%
More