Advertisement
MUEL vs OLNCF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MUEL is a StrongBuy and OLNCF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MUEL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOLNCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- MUEL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- OLNCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MUEL’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OLNCF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MUEL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
- OLNCF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
MUEL (@Metal Fabrication) experienced а +1.37% price change this week, while OLNCF (@Metal Fabrication) price change was -0.87% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was +3.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.33%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Metal Fabrication (+3.83% weekly)The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.
| MUEL | OLNCF | MUEL / OLNCF | |
| Capitalization | 347M | 17.4M | 1,994% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 2.22M | - |
| Gain YTD | 70.082 | 20.000 | 350% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 57.00 | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 14.9M | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 3.13M | - |
| Total Debt | 8.16M | 5.44M | 150% |
MUEL | OLNCF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 41 Fair valued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 1 | 47 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 87 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 6 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MUEL's Valuation (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OLNCF (84). This means that MUEL’s stock grew somewhat faster than OLNCF’s over the last 12 months.
MUEL's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OLNCF (47). This means that MUEL’s stock grew somewhat faster than OLNCF’s over the last 12 months.
OLNCF's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as MUEL (100). This means that OLNCF’s stock grew similarly to MUEL’s over the last 12 months.
MUEL's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as OLNCF (38). This means that MUEL’s stock grew similarly to OLNCF’s over the last 12 months.
OLNCF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MUEL (90). This means that OLNCF’s stock grew significantly faster than MUEL’s over the last 12 months.
| MUEL | OLNCF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 41% | 3 days ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 48% | 3 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 17 days ago 54% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 25 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 73% |
Advertisement
MUEL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MUEL and LQMT have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MUEL and LQMT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MUEL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MUEL | 100% | +0.55% | ||
| LQMT - MUEL | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.99% | ||
| TPCS - MUEL | 4% Poorly correlated | +2.22% | ||
| IAALF - MUEL | 1% Poorly correlated | +3.70% | ||
| BEKSF - MUEL | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RYBIF - MUEL | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
OLNCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that OLNCF and ESAB have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OLNCF and ESAB's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OLNCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OLNCF | 100% | +1.79% | ||
| ESAB - OLNCF | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.92% | ||
| MUEL - OLNCF | 1% Poorly correlated | +0.55% | ||
| BEKSF - OLNCF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TPCS - OLNCF | -0% Poorly correlated | +2.22% | ||
| RYBIF - OLNCF | -2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||