Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MUC vs PCQ
MUC vs PCQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MUC vs. PCQ commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MUC is a Hold and PCQ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MUC has more net assets: 1.04B vs. PCQ (173M). MUC has a higher annual dividend yield than PCQ: MUC (-1.733) vs PCQ (-5.657). MUC was incepted earlier than PCQ: MUC (27 years) vs PCQ (24 years). PCQ (1.22) has a lower expense ratio than MUC (1.46). MUC has a higher turnover PCQ (24.00) vs PCQ (24.00).
| MUC | PCQ | MUC / PCQ | |
| Gain YTD | -1.733 | -5.657 | 31% |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 173M | 603% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.22 | 120% |
| Turnover | 59.00 | 24.00 | 246% |
| Yield | 4.76 | 3.31 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| MUC | PCQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 25 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers