| MUB | PZA | MUB / PZA | |
| Gain YTD | 3.080 | 1.112 | 277% |
| Net Assets | 41.4B | 3.28B | 1,261% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 0.28 | 18% |
| Turnover | 17.00 | 6.00 | 283% |
| Yield | 3.11 | 3.46 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 18 years | - |
| MUB | PZA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 45% | 3 days ago 46% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 41% | 3 days ago 48% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 51% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 35% | 3 days ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 46% | 3 days ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 39% | 3 days ago 52% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 50% | 22 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 40% | 3 days ago 50% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 67% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that PZA and NIQ have been poorly correlated (+-6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PZA and NIQ's prices will move in lockstep.