It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MTZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMYRG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MTZ’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MYRG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
MTZ (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +6.39% price change this week, while MYRG (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +4.51% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +5.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.79%.
MTZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
MYRG is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.
Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
MTZ | MYRG | MTZ / MYRG | |
Capitalization | 12.1B | 2.48B | 488% |
EBITDA | 951M | 118M | 806% |
Gain YTD | 12.193 | 7.407 | 165% |
P/E Ratio | 56.15 | 73.98 | 76% |
Revenue | 12.3B | 3.36B | 366% |
Total Cash | 400M | 3.46M | 11,547% |
Total Debt | 2.63B | 120M | 2,193% |
MTZ | MYRG | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 26 | 24 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 24 | 26 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 82 | 83 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 5 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MTZ's Valuation (88) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MYRG (92). This means that MTZ’s stock grew similarly to MYRG’s over the last 12 months.
MTZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MYRG (26). This means that MTZ’s stock grew similarly to MYRG’s over the last 12 months.
MTZ's SMR Rating (82) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MYRG (83). This means that MTZ’s stock grew similarly to MYRG’s over the last 12 months.
MYRG's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (41). This means that MYRG’s stock grew similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
MYRG's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Engineering And Construction industry is significantly better than the same rating for MTZ (100). This means that MYRG’s stock grew significantly faster than MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
MTZ | MYRG | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | 1 day ago76% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% | 1 day ago67% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | 1 day ago76% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago80% | 1 day ago81% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago75% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago78% | 1 day ago76% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 1 day ago73% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 23 days ago74% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 1 day ago64% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago80% | 1 day ago73% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTZ has been closely correlated with EME. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTZ jumps, then EME could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MTZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MTZ | 100% | +3.05% | ||
EME - MTZ | 83% Closely correlated | +4.07% | ||
PRIM - MTZ | 80% Closely correlated | +3.73% | ||
PWR - MTZ | 80% Closely correlated | +2.12% | ||
FIX - MTZ | 79% Closely correlated | +3.90% | ||
IESC - MTZ | 75% Closely correlated | +5.75% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MYRG has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MYRG jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MYRG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MYRG | 100% | +2.68% | ||
MTZ - MYRG | 68% Closely correlated | +3.05% | ||
EME - MYRG | 64% Loosely correlated | +4.07% | ||
PRIM - MYRG | 63% Loosely correlated | +3.73% | ||
STRL - MYRG | 63% Loosely correlated | +3.11% | ||
APG - MYRG | 63% Loosely correlated | +2.74% | ||
More |