MTYFF
Price
$30.53
Change
+$0.06 (+0.20%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
690.14M
YUMC
Price
$43.08
Change
+$0.08 (+0.19%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
15.99B
57 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MTYFF vs YUMC

Header iconMTYFF vs YUMC Comparison
Open Charts MTYFF vs YUMCBanner chart's image
MTY Food Group
Price$30.53
Change+$0.06 (+0.20%)
Volume$9.21K
Capitalization690.14M
Yum China Holdings
Price$43.08
Change+$0.08 (+0.19%)
Volume$2.4M
Capitalization15.99B
MTYFF vs YUMC Comparison Chart
Loading...
YUMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MTYFF vs. YUMC commentary
Jun 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTYFF is a Hold and YUMC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 09, 2025
Stock price -- (MTYFF: $31.08 vs. YUMC: $43.48)
Brand notoriety: MTYFF: Not notable vs. YUMC: Notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MTYFF: 27% vs. YUMC: 55%
Market capitalization -- MTYFF: $690.14M vs. YUMC: $15.99B
MTYFF [@Restaurants] is valued at $690.14M. YUMC’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $15.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $220.93B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MTYFF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileYUMC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MTYFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • YUMC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MTYFF and YUMC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

YUMC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • YUMC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

MTYFF (@Restaurants) experienced а -1.24% price change this week, while YUMC (@Restaurants) price change was +2.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +1.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

YUMC is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+1.86% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
YUMC($16B) has a higher market cap than MTYFF($690M). MTYFF has higher P/E ratio than YUMC: MTYFF (113.18) vs YUMC (17.99). MTYFF YTD gains are higher at: -5.388 vs. YUMC (-8.799). MTYFF has less debt than YUMC: MTYFF (1.22B) vs YUMC (2.41B).
MTYFFYUMCMTYFF / YUMC
Capitalization690M16B4%
EBITDA144MN/A-
Gain YTD-5.388-8.79961%
P/E Ratio113.1817.99629%
Revenue1.17BN/A-
Total Cash68.8MN/A-
Total Debt1.22B2.41B51%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTYFF vs YUMC: Fundamental Ratings
MTYFF
YUMC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
887
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
61100
SMR RATING
1..100
8955
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5659
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
250
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a43

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MTYFF's Valuation (29) in the null industry is in the same range as YUMC (31) in the Restaurants industry. This means that MTYFF’s stock grew similarly to YUMC’s over the last 12 months.

MTYFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for YUMC (100) in the Restaurants industry. This means that MTYFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than YUMC’s over the last 12 months.

YUMC's SMR Rating (55) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTYFF (89) in the null industry. This means that YUMC’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTYFF’s over the last 12 months.

MTYFF's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as YUMC (59) in the Restaurants industry. This means that MTYFF’s stock grew similarly to YUMC’s over the last 12 months.

MTYFF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for YUMC (50) in the Restaurants industry. This means that MTYFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than YUMC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
YUMC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
YUMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

MTYFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MTYFF and RICK have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MTYFF and RICK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTYFF
1D Price
Change %
MTYFF100%
N/A
RICK - MTYFF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.21%
WEN - MTYFF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
YUMC - MTYFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.12%
PBPB - MTYFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.47%
KRUS - MTYFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.03%
More

YUMC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YUMC has been loosely correlated with YUM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YUMC jumps, then YUM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YUMC
1D Price
Change %
YUMC100%
+1.12%
YUM - YUMC
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.65%
QSR - YUMC
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
ARCO - YUMC
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.05%
HDL - YUMC
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
DIN - YUMC
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
More