Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MTUM vs SCHG
MTUM vs SCHG Comparison
Open Charts MTUM vs SCHG
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
Price$245.28
Change-$11.17 (-4.36%)
Volume$16.03K
Net Assets21.33B
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$30.96
Change-$0.47 (-1.49%)
Volume$11.86K
Net Assets52.49B
MTUM vs SCHG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MTUM vs. SCHG commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTUM is a Hold and SCHG is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHG has more net assets: 52.5B vs. MTUM (21.3B). MTUM has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHG: MTUM (2.453) vs SCHG (-3.617). MTUM was incepted earlier than SCHG: MTUM (13 years) vs SCHG (16 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than MTUM (0.15). MTUM has a higher turnover SCHG (27.00) vs SCHG (27.00).
| MTUM | SCHG | MTUM / SCHG | |
| Gain YTD | 2.453 | -3.617 | -68% |
| Net Assets | 21.3B | 52.5B | 41% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.04 | 375% |
| Turnover | 116.00 | 27.00 | 430% |
| Yield | 0.89 | 0.37 | 243% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| MTUM | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 82% | 9 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 80% | 6 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
MTUM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTUM has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTUM jumps, then GS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MTUM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTUM | 100% | -0.74% | ||
| GS - MTUM | 81% Closely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| ARES - MTUM | 80% Closely correlated | -10.15% | ||
| PH - MTUM | 80% Closely correlated | +1.30% | ||
| MS - MTUM | 80% Closely correlated | -1.18% | ||
| KKR - MTUM | 79% Closely correlated | -9.69% | ||
More | ||||
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | -1.96% | ||
| AMZN - SCHG | 80% Closely correlated | -1.79% | ||
| NVDA - SCHG | 79% Closely correlated | -2.84% | ||
| PH - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | +1.30% | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 77% Closely correlated | -2.87% | ||
| APO - SCHG | 76% Closely correlated | -4.76% | ||
More | ||||