Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MTUM vs SCHG
MTUM vs SCHG Comparison
Open Charts MTUM vs SCHG
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
Price$254.66
Change+$1.07 (+0.42%)
Volume$577.65K
Net Assets19.22B
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$31.64
Change+$0.14 (+0.44%)
Volume$8.4M
Net Assets50.25B
MTUM vs SCHG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MTUM vs. SCHG commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTUM is a Hold and SCHG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHG has more net assets: 50.2B vs. MTUM (19.2B). MTUM has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHG: MTUM (23.937) vs SCHG (13.862). MTUM was incepted earlier than SCHG: MTUM (12 years) vs SCHG (16 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than MTUM (0.15). MTUM has a higher turnover SCHG (3.00) vs SCHG (3.00).
| MTUM | SCHG | MTUM / SCHG | |
| Gain YTD | 23.937 | 13.862 | 173% |
| Net Assets | 19.2B | 50.2B | 38% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.04 | 375% |
| Turnover | 95.00 | 3.00 | 3,167% |
| Yield | 0.90 | 0.37 | 239% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| MTUM | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 6 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 1 day ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
MTUM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTUM has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTUM jumps, then GS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MTUM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTUM | 100% | +0.42% | ||
| GS - MTUM | 81% Closely correlated | +0.98% | ||
| ARES - MTUM | 81% Closely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| MS - MTUM | 80% Closely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| PH - MTUM | 80% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| KKR - MTUM | 80% Closely correlated | -1.22% | ||
More | ||||
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | +0.44% | ||
| AMZN - SCHG | 79% Closely correlated | +0.75% | ||
| NVDA - SCHG | 79% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| PH - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| META - SCHG | 77% Closely correlated | -0.69% | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 77% Closely correlated | +0.87% | ||
More | ||||