MTTWF
Price
$6.18
Change
+$0.08 (+1.31%)
Updated
Sep 10 closing price
Capitalization
2.19B
PFGC
Price
$104.30
Change
+$1.30 (+1.26%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
16.32B
37 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MTTWF vs PFGC

Header iconMTTWF vs PFGC Comparison
Open Charts MTTWF vs PFGCBanner chart's image
METRO AG
Price$6.18
Change+$0.08 (+1.31%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.19B
Performance Food Group
Price$104.30
Change+$1.30 (+1.26%)
Volume$737.41K
Capitalization16.32B
MTTWF vs PFGC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MTTWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PFGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MTTWF vs. PFGC commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTTWF is a Buy and PFGC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (MTTWF: $6.18 vs. PFGC: $104.30)
Brand notoriety: MTTWF and PFGC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MTTWF: 15% vs. PFGC: 43%
Market capitalization -- MTTWF: $2.19B vs. PFGC: $16.32B
MTTWF [@Food Distributors] is valued at $2.19B. PFGC’s [@Food Distributors] market capitalization is $16.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Distributors] industry ranges from $39.18B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Distributors] industry is $4.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MTTWF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePFGC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MTTWF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PFGC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PFGC is a better buy in the long-term than MTTWF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MTTWF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFGC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MTTWF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • PFGC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MTTWF is a better buy in the short-term than PFGC.

Price Growth

MTTWF (@Food Distributors) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PFGC (@Food Distributors) price change was -1.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was +3.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

PFGC is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Distributors (+3.33% weekly)

Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFGC($16.3B) has a higher market cap than MTTWF($2.19B). PFGC has higher P/E ratio than MTTWF: PFGC (47.84) vs MTTWF (4.14). PFGC YTD gains are higher at: 23.359 vs. MTTWF (16.165). PFGC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.54B vs. MTTWF (1.02B). MTTWF has more cash in the bank: 1.63B vs. PFGC (78.5M). PFGC has higher revenues than MTTWF: PFGC (63.3B) vs MTTWF (31.5B).
MTTWFPFGCMTTWF / PFGC
Capitalization2.19B16.3B13%
EBITDA1.02B1.54B67%
Gain YTD16.16523.35969%
P/E Ratio4.1447.849%
Revenue31.5B63.3B50%
Total Cash1.63B78.5M2,082%
Total DebtN/A8B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTTWF vs PFGC: Fundamental Ratings
MTTWF
PFGC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5083
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1009
SMR RATING
1..100
9577
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5244
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9911
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MTTWF's Valuation (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PFGC (71) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that MTTWF’s stock grew significantly faster than PFGC’s over the last 12 months.

PFGC's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Food Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for MTTWF (100) in the null industry. This means that PFGC’s stock grew significantly faster than MTTWF’s over the last 12 months.

PFGC's SMR Rating (77) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as MTTWF (95) in the null industry. This means that PFGC’s stock grew similarly to MTTWF’s over the last 12 months.

PFGC's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as MTTWF (52) in the null industry. This means that PFGC’s stock grew similarly to MTTWF’s over the last 12 months.

PFGC's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Food Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for MTTWF (99) in the null industry. This means that PFGC’s stock grew significantly faster than MTTWF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MTTWFPFGC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
12%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
9%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MTTWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PFGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME26.421.15
+4.55%
GameStop Corp
TSLA440.4017.01
+4.02%
Tesla
SPY661.823.77
+0.57%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
AAPL255.46-1.41
-0.55%
Apple

MTTWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MTTWF and DIT have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MTTWF and DIT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTTWF
1D Price
Change %
MTTWF100%
N/A
DIT - MTTWF
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
SYY - MTTWF
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
CHEF - MTTWF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.84%
CVGW - MTTWF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
PFGC - MTTWF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.26%
More

PFGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFGC has been closely correlated with USFD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFGC jumps, then USFD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFGC
1D Price
Change %
PFGC100%
+1.26%
USFD - PFGC
74%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
CHEF - PFGC
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.84%
SYY - PFGC
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
UNFI - PFGC
37%
Loosely correlated
+4.74%
ANDE - PFGC
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.37%
More