MTSFF
Price
$9.66
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
19.35B
NMEHF
Price
$5.75
Change
-$0.13 (-2.21%)
Updated
Jun 16 closing price
Capitalization
4.35B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MTSFF vs NMEHF

Header iconMTSFF vs NMEHF Comparison
Open Charts MTSFF vs NMEHFBanner chart's image
Mitsui Fudosan
Price$9.66
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.9K
Capitalization19.35B
Nomura Real Estate Holdings
Price$5.75
Change-$0.13 (-2.21%)
Volume$1.84K
Capitalization4.35B
MTSFF vs NMEHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MTSFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NMEHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MTSFF vs. NMEHF commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTSFF is a Buy and NMEHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (MTSFF: $9.66 vs. NMEHF: $5.75)
Brand notoriety: MTSFF and NMEHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MTSFF: 123% vs. NMEHF: 28%
Market capitalization -- MTSFF: $19.35B vs. NMEHF: $4.35B
MTSFF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $19.35B. NMEHF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $4.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MTSFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNMEHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MTSFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NMEHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MTSFF is a better buy in the long-term than NMEHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MTSFF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMEHF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MTSFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NMEHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MTSFF is a better buy in the short-term than NMEHF.

Price Growth

MTSFF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +1.15% price change this week, while NMEHF (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +2.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.21%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+2.35% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTSFF($19.4B) has a higher market cap than NMEHF($4.35B). MTSFF has higher P/E ratio than NMEHF: MTSFF (13.79) vs NMEHF (9.28). MTSFF YTD gains are higher at: 22.745 vs. NMEHF (18.630). MTSFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 352B vs. NMEHF (119B). MTSFF has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. NMEHF (61.4B). NMEHF has less debt than MTSFF: NMEHF (1.12T) vs MTSFF (4.28T). MTSFF has higher revenues than NMEHF: MTSFF (2.26T) vs NMEHF (655B).
MTSFFNMEHFMTSFF / NMEHF
Capitalization19.4B4.35B446%
EBITDA352B119B296%
Gain YTD22.74518.630122%
P/E Ratio13.799.28149%
Revenue2.26T655B345%
Total Cash170B61.4B277%
Total Debt4.28T1.12T381%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTSFF vs NMEHF: Fundamental Ratings
MTSFF
NMEHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
33100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5255
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7772
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NMEHF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is in the same range as MTSFF (45). This means that NMEHF’s stock grew similarly to MTSFF’s over the last 12 months.

MTSFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NMEHF (100). This means that MTSFF’s stock grew significantly faster than NMEHF’s over the last 12 months.

MTSFF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NMEHF (100). This means that MTSFF’s stock grew similarly to NMEHF’s over the last 12 months.

MTSFF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as NMEHF (55). This means that MTSFF’s stock grew similarly to NMEHF’s over the last 12 months.

NMEHF's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as MTSFF (77). This means that NMEHF’s stock grew similarly to MTSFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MTSFFNMEHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
2%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MTSFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NMEHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OSBC19.080.18
+0.95%
Old Second Bancorp
TROX5.580.05
+0.90%
Tronox Limited
FRAF37.060.30
+0.82%
Franklin Financial Services Corp
BEKE17.670.02
+0.11%
KE Holdings
HCWB4.06-0.11
-2.64%
HCW Biologics Inc

MTSFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MTSFF and MTSFY have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MTSFF and MTSFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTSFF
1D Price
Change %
MTSFF100%
N/A
MTSFY - MTSFF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.30%
DRUNF - MTSFF
25%
Poorly correlated
+5.13%
MITEF - MTSFF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NMEHF - MTSFF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MITEY - MTSFF
14%
Poorly correlated
-1.61%
More

NMEHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NMEHF and MHIVF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NMEHF and MHIVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMEHF
1D Price
Change %
NMEHF100%
N/A
MHIVF - NMEHF
26%
Poorly correlated
+5.56%
UK - NMEHF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
MTSFY - NMEHF
19%
Poorly correlated
-1.30%
MTSFF - NMEHF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNLAY - NMEHF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More