Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MTRCX vs RLBAX
MTRCX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts MTRCX vs RLBAX
MFS Total Return C
Price$20.30
Change-$0.05 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.75B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.59
Change+$0.20 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets259.11B
MTRCX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MTRCX vs. RLBAX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTRCX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 259B vs. MTRCX (7.75B). MTRCX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: MTRCX (1.55) vs RLBAX (1.15). MTRCX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: MTRCX (31 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). MTRCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). MTRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MTRCX: RLBAX (250) vs MTRCX (1000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.12 vs. MTRCX (-0.04). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.40 vs. MTRCX (7.51).
| MTRCX | RLBAX | MTRCX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.31 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.31 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.345 | 10.805 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.75B | 259B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.55 | 1.15 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.04 | 9.12 | -0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.46 | 37.15 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.51 | 35.40 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.19 | 67.71 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement