MTR
Price
$4.26
Change
-$0.32 (-6.99%)
Updated
Jan 15 closing price
Capitalization
7.94M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
STMGF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.02 (-25.00%)
Updated
Jan 15 closing price
Capitalization
361.66K
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MTR vs STMGF

Header iconMTR vs STMGF Comparison
Open Charts MTR vs STMGFBanner chart's image
Mesa Royalty Trust
Price$4.26
Change-$0.32 (-6.99%)
Volume$21.71K
Capitalization7.94M
Stamper Oil & Gas
Price$0.06
Change-$0.02 (-25.00%)
Volume$7K
Capitalization361.66K
MTR vs STMGF Comparison Chart in %
MTR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
STMGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MTR vs. STMGF commentary
Jan 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTR is a Hold and STMGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 16, 2026
Stock price -- (MTR: $4.26 vs. STMGF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: MTR and STMGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MTR: 192% vs. STMGF: 30%
Market capitalization -- MTR: $7.94M vs. STMGF: $361.66K
MTR [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $7.94M. STMGF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $361.66K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $122.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MTR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSTMGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MTR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • STMGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, STMGF is a better buy in the long-term than MTR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MTR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STMGF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MTR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • STMGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, STMGF is a better buy in the short-term than MTR.

Price Growth

MTR (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -0.93% price change this week, while STMGF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -20.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +3.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.57%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+3.52% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTR($7.94M) has a higher market cap than STMGF($362K). MTR YTD gains are higher at: -1.389 vs. STMGF (-20.000).
MTRSTMGFMTR / STMGF
Capitalization7.94M362K2,193%
EBITDA362KN/A-
Gain YTD-1.389-20.0007%
P/E Ratio18.55N/A-
Revenue557KN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTR vs STMGF: Fundamental Ratings
MTR
STMGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7333
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
92100
SMR RATING
1..100
5899
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8037
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
43100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

STMGF's Valuation (46) in the null industry is in the same range as MTR (52) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that STMGF’s stock grew similarly to MTR’s over the last 12 months.

MTR's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as STMGF (100) in the null industry. This means that MTR’s stock grew similarly to STMGF’s over the last 12 months.

MTR's SMR Rating (58) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STMGF (99) in the null industry. This means that MTR’s stock grew somewhat faster than STMGF’s over the last 12 months.

STMGF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTR (80) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that STMGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTR’s over the last 12 months.

MTR's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STMGF (100) in the null industry. This means that MTR’s stock grew somewhat faster than STMGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MTRSTMGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MTR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
STMGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME21.360.34
+1.62%
GameStop Corp
SPY692.241.88
+0.27%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
TSLA438.57-0.63
-0.14%
Tesla
AAPL258.21-1.75
-0.67%
Apple
BTC.X95551.190000-1378.140600
-1.42%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

MTR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTR has been loosely correlated with MXC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MTR jumps, then MXC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTR
1D Price
Change %
MTR100%
-6.99%
MXC - MTR
36%
Loosely correlated
-7.22%
USEG - MTR
35%
Loosely correlated
-4.72%
WTI - MTR
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.12%
STMGF - MTR
30%
Poorly correlated
-20.00%
INDO - MTR
30%
Poorly correlated
-15.94%
More

STMGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that STMGF and USEG have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STMGF and USEG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STMGF
1D Price
Change %
STMGF100%
-20.00%
USEG - STMGF
30%
Poorly correlated
-4.72%
MTR - STMGF
30%
Poorly correlated
-6.99%
PED - STMGF
28%
Poorly correlated
-4.28%
BRN - STMGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DELKY - STMGF
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
More