MTR
Price
$5.08
Change
-$0.04 (-0.78%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
Capitalization
9.46M
STMGF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
Capitalization
361.66K
Interact to see
Advertisement

MTR vs STMGF

Header iconMTR vs STMGF Comparison
Open Charts MTR vs STMGFBanner chart's image
Mesa Royalty Trust
Price$5.08
Change-$0.04 (-0.78%)
Volume$1.35K
Capitalization9.46M
Stamper Oil & Gas
Price$0.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization361.66K
MTR vs STMGF Comparison Chart in %
MTR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STMGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MTR vs. STMGF commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTR is a Hold and STMGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (MTR: $5.07 vs. STMGF: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: MTR and STMGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MTR: 44% vs. STMGF: 149%
Market capitalization -- MTR: $9.46M vs. STMGF: $361.66K
MTR [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $9.46M. STMGF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $361.66K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $108.01B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MTR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSTMGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MTR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • STMGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MTR and STMGF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MTR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STMGF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MTR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • STMGF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MTR is a better buy in the short-term than STMGF.

Price Growth

MTR (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -0.04% price change this week, while STMGF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -6.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.81%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+0.44% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTR($9.46M) has a higher market cap than STMGF($362K). STMGF YTD gains are higher at: 261.000 vs. MTR (-11.481).
MTRSTMGFMTR / STMGF
Capitalization9.46M362K2,613%
EBITDA306KN/A-
Gain YTD-11.481261.000-4%
P/E Ratio24.01N/A-
Revenue492KN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTR vs STMGF: Fundamental Ratings
MTR
STMGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5092
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
88100
SMR RATING
1..100
6199
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7934
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

STMGF's Valuation (52) in the null industry is in the same range as MTR (71) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that STMGF’s stock grew similarly to MTR’s over the last 12 months.

MTR's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as STMGF (100) in the null industry. This means that MTR’s stock grew similarly to STMGF’s over the last 12 months.

MTR's SMR Rating (61) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STMGF (99) in the null industry. This means that MTR’s stock grew somewhat faster than STMGF’s over the last 12 months.

STMGF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTR (79) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that STMGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTR’s over the last 12 months.

MTR's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is significantly better than the same rating for STMGF (100) in the null industry. This means that MTR’s stock grew significantly faster than STMGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MTRSTMGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
75%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MTR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STMGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IPST0.640.03
+4.43%
Heritage Distilling Holding Company Inc
PKG203.33-2.01
-0.98%
Packaging Corp
VTLE15.49-0.37
-2.33%
Vital Energy
KALA1.31-0.07
-5.07%
Kala BIO
DRD28.52-3.16
-9.97%
DRDGOLD Ltd

MTR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTR has been loosely correlated with BRN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MTR jumps, then BRN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTR
1D Price
Change %
MTR100%
N/A
BRN - MTR
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.81%
HUSA - MTR
34%
Loosely correlated
-3.54%
USEG - MTR
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.68%
WTI - MTR
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.34%
STMGF - MTR
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

STMGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STMGF has been loosely correlated with HUSA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STMGF jumps, then HUSA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STMGF
1D Price
Change %
STMGF100%
N/A
HUSA - STMGF
35%
Loosely correlated
-3.54%
USEG - STMGF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.68%
MTR - STMGF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INDO - STMGF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
PED - STMGF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.93%
More