MTPOF
Price
$1.33
Change
+$0.02 (+1.53%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
5.36B
SBGOF
Price
$15.02
Change
+$0.36 (+2.46%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
21.99B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MTPOF vs SBGOF

Header iconMTPOF vs SBGOF Comparison
Open Charts MTPOF vs SBGOFBanner chart's image
Metropolitan Bank & Trust
Price$1.33
Change+$0.02 (+1.53%)
Volume$334
Capitalization5.36B
Standard Bank Group
Price$15.02
Change+$0.36 (+2.46%)
Volume$194
Capitalization21.99B
MTPOF vs SBGOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MTPOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBGOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MTPOF vs. SBGOF commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTPOF is a Hold and SBGOF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (MTPOF: $1.33 vs. SBGOF: $15.02)
Brand notoriety: MTPOF and SBGOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MTPOF: 21% vs. SBGOF: 33%
Market capitalization -- MTPOF: $5.46B vs. SBGOF: $21.99B
MTPOF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $5.46B. SBGOF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $21.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MTPOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSBGOF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MTPOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SBGOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBGOF is a better buy in the long-term than MTPOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MTPOF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBGOF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MTPOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • SBGOF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MTPOF is a better buy in the short-term than SBGOF.

Price Growth

MTPOF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.45% price change this week, while SBGOF (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.52%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.34% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBGOF($22B) has a higher market cap than MTPOF($5.36B). SBGOF has higher P/E ratio than MTPOF: SBGOF (9.56) vs MTPOF (6.67). SBGOF YTD gains are higher at: 35.705 vs. MTPOF (12.310). SBGOF has less debt than MTPOF: SBGOF (31.1B) vs MTPOF (105B). SBGOF has higher revenues than MTPOF: SBGOF (196B) vs MTPOF (151B).
MTPOFSBGOFMTPOF / SBGOF
Capitalization5.36B22B24%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD12.31035.70534%
P/E Ratio6.679.5670%
Revenue151B196B77%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt105B31.1B338%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTPOF vs SBGOF: Fundamental Ratings
MTPOF
SBGOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4936
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5743
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8251
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7565

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBGOF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is in the same range as MTPOF (57). This means that SBGOF’s stock grew similarly to MTPOF’s over the last 12 months.

SBGOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as MTPOF (49). This means that SBGOF’s stock grew similarly to MTPOF’s over the last 12 months.

SBGOF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as MTPOF (1). This means that SBGOF’s stock grew similarly to MTPOF’s over the last 12 months.

SBGOF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as MTPOF (57). This means that SBGOF’s stock grew similarly to MTPOF’s over the last 12 months.

SBGOF's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as MTPOF (82). This means that SBGOF’s stock grew similarly to MTPOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MTPOFSBGOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
26%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MTPOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBGOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RING56.941.72
+3.11%
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF
TBFG28.890.07
+0.24%
The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF
BCUS32.290.01
+0.02%
BANCREEK U.S. Large Cap ETF
FFLV22.98-0.09
-0.39%
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF
HOOG60.57-1.89
-3.03%
Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF

MTPOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTPOF has been loosely correlated with SBGOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MTPOF jumps, then SBGOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTPOF
1D Price
Change %
MTPOF100%
+1.60%
SBGOF - MTPOF
52%
Loosely correlated
+2.45%
HSNGF - MTPOF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIHHF - MTPOF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RSNHF - MTPOF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PBNNF - MTPOF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SBGOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBGOF has been loosely correlated with MTPOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SBGOF jumps, then MTPOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBGOF
1D Price
Change %
SBGOF100%
+2.45%
MTPOF - SBGOF
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.60%
CIHHF - SBGOF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKNIY - SBGOF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
MNBO - SBGOF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A