MTPOF
Price
$1.33
Change
+$0.02 (+1.53%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
5.46B
RSNHF
Price
$9.95
Change
-$0.71 (-6.66%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
22.63B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MTPOF vs RSNHF

Header iconMTPOF vs RSNHF Comparison
Open Charts MTPOF vs RSNHFBanner chart's image
Metropolitan Bank & Trust
Price$1.33
Change+$0.02 (+1.53%)
Volume$334
Capitalization5.46B
Resona Holdings
Price$9.95
Change-$0.71 (-6.66%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization22.63B
MTPOF vs RSNHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MTPOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RSNHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MTPOF vs. RSNHF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTPOF is a Hold and RSNHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (MTPOF: $1.33 vs. RSNHF: $9.95)
Brand notoriety: MTPOF and RSNHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MTPOF: 21% vs. RSNHF: 165%
Market capitalization -- MTPOF: $5.46B vs. RSNHF: $22.63B
MTPOF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $5.46B. RSNHF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $22.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MTPOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRSNHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MTPOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RSNHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RSNHF is a better buy in the long-term than MTPOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MTPOF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RSNHF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MTPOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • RSNHF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MTPOF is a better buy in the short-term than RSNHF.

Price Growth

MTPOF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.45% price change this week, while RSNHF (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSNHF($22.6B) has a higher market cap than MTPOF($5.46B). RSNHF has higher P/E ratio than MTPOF: RSNHF (15.94) vs MTPOF (6.95). RSNHF YTD gains are higher at: 32.737 vs. MTPOF (12.310). MTPOF has less debt than RSNHF: MTPOF (105B) vs RSNHF (5.28T). RSNHF has higher revenues than MTPOF: RSNHF (838B) vs MTPOF (151B).
MTPOFRSNHFMTPOF / RSNHF
Capitalization5.46B22.6B24%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD12.31032.73738%
P/E Ratio6.9515.9444%
Revenue151B838B18%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt105B5.28T2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTPOF vs RSNHF: Fundamental Ratings
MTPOF
RSNHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4928
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5744
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8237
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
751

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MTPOF's Valuation (57) in the null industry is in the same range as RSNHF (81). This means that MTPOF’s stock grew similarly to RSNHF’s over the last 12 months.

RSNHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as MTPOF (49). This means that RSNHF’s stock grew similarly to MTPOF’s over the last 12 months.

RSNHF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as MTPOF (1). This means that RSNHF’s stock grew similarly to MTPOF’s over the last 12 months.

RSNHF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as MTPOF (57). This means that RSNHF’s stock grew similarly to MTPOF’s over the last 12 months.

RSNHF's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTPOF (82). This means that RSNHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTPOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MTPOFRSNHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MTPOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RSNHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RING56.941.72
+3.11%
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF
TBFG28.890.07
+0.24%
The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF
BCUS32.290.01
+0.02%
BANCREEK U.S. Large Cap ETF
FFLV22.98-0.09
-0.39%
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF
HOOG60.57-1.89
-3.03%
Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF

MTPOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTPOF has been loosely correlated with SBGOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MTPOF jumps, then SBGOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTPOF
1D Price
Change %
MTPOF100%
+1.60%
SBGOF - MTPOF
52%
Loosely correlated
+2.45%
HSNGF - MTPOF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIHHF - MTPOF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RSNHF - MTPOF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PBNNF - MTPOF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RSNHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RSNHF and CDAB have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RSNHF and CDAB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RSNHF
1D Price
Change %
RSNHF100%
N/A
CDAB - RSNHF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNCDY - RSNHF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
PBNNF - RSNHF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTPOF - RSNHF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
INFT - RSNHF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More