MTN
Price
$128.36
Change
-$21.76 (-14.50%)
Updated
Feb 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.67B
41 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SBET
Price
$7.66
Change
-$9.29 (-54.81%)
Updated
Feb 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.53B
22 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MTN vs SBET

Header iconMTN vs SBET Comparison
Open Charts MTN vs SBETBanner chart's image
Vail Resorts
Price$128.36
Change-$21.76 (-14.50%)
Volume$4.18K
Capitalization4.67B
SharpLink Gaming
Price$7.66
Change-$9.29 (-54.81%)
Volume$55.15K
Capitalization1.53B
MTN vs SBET Comparison Chart in %
MTN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SBET
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MTN vs. SBET commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTN is a Buy and SBET is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (MTN: $130.50 vs. SBET: $7.79)
Brand notoriety: MTN and SBET are both not notable
MTN represents the Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines, while SBET is part of the Advertising/Marketing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MTN: 71% vs. SBET: 141%
Market capitalization -- MTN: $4.67B vs. SBET: $1.53B
MTN [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] is valued at $4.67B. SBET’s [@Advertising/Marketing Services] market capitalization is $1.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry ranges from $37.62B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Advertising/Marketing Services] industry ranges from $163.23B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry is $5.28B. The average market capitalization across the [@Advertising/Marketing Services] industry is $4.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MTN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSBET’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MTN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SBET’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBET is a better buy in the long-term than MTN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MTN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBET’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MTN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SBET’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MTN is a better buy in the short-term than SBET.

Price Growth

MTN (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а -4.99% price change this week, while SBET (@Advertising/Marketing Services) price change was -16.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was -0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.34%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Advertising/Marketing Services industry was -4.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +51.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

MTN is expected to report earnings on Mar 16, 2026.

SBET is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (-0.30% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.

@Advertising/Marketing Services (-4.27% weekly)

Making a brand known to people, garnering more clients/consumers for its product and solidifying the brand’s position in an industry – all of these are essential to a company’s growth, and that’s where marketing/advertising come in as one of the key catalysts. Advertising industry is a global multibillion-dollar business of public relations and marketing companies, media services and advertising agencies – entities that help to connect manufacturers/producers with customers. Digital media has played a big role in the growth of global advertising, and agencies invest substantially to integrate advanced technologies into their business operations. According to some estimates, the U.S. advertising industry is expected to generate revenue of $52.6 billion by 2023, up from almost $40 billion in 2015 . Omnicom Group Inc., Trade Desk, Inc. and Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. are some of the major U.S. companies in the industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTN($4.67B) has a higher market cap than SBET($1.53B). MTN has higher P/E ratio than SBET: MTN (18.78) vs SBET (0.42). MTN YTD gains are higher at: -1.732 vs. SBET (-12.864). MTN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 864M vs. SBET (-272.8K). MTN has more cash in the bank: 581M vs. SBET (37.8M). SBET has less debt than MTN: SBET (12.8M) vs MTN (3.42B). MTN has higher revenues than SBET: MTN (2.98B) vs SBET (13.1M).
MTNSBETMTN / SBET
Capitalization4.67B1.53B305%
EBITDA864M-272.8K-316,713%
Gain YTD-1.732-12.86413%
P/E Ratio18.780.424,472%
Revenue2.98B13.1M22,710%
Total Cash581M37.8M1,537%
Total Debt3.42B12.8M26,719%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTN vs SBET: Fundamental Ratings
MTN
SBET
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6774
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
1490
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6263
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
862
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBET's Valuation (62) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as MTN (86) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that SBET’s stock grew similarly to MTN’s over the last 12 months.

SBET's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as MTN (100) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that SBET’s stock grew similarly to MTN’s over the last 12 months.

MTN's SMR Rating (14) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is significantly better than the same rating for SBET (90) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that MTN’s stock grew significantly faster than SBET’s over the last 12 months.

MTN's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as SBET (63) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that MTN’s stock grew similarly to SBET’s over the last 12 months.

SBET's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for MTN (86) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that SBET’s stock grew significantly faster than MTN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MTNSBET
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MTN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SBET
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HGHVX49.160.42
+0.86%
Hartford Healthcare R6
CDOYX44.470.34
+0.77%
Columbia Dividend Opportunity Inst3
JMVRX33.110.18
+0.55%
JPMorgan Mid Cap Value R5
NWHMX12.220.06
+0.49%
Nationwide Bailard Intl Eqs R6
ARRFX13.030.03
+0.23%
AMG River Road Focused Absolute Value N

MTN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTN has been loosely correlated with PENN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MTN jumps, then PENN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTN
1D Price
Change %
MTN100%
-1.93%
PENN - MTN
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.87%
MGM - MTN
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
BYD - MTN
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
CZR - MTN
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.53%
HGV - MTN
42%
Loosely correlated
+2.22%
More

SBET and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SBET and MTN have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SBET and MTN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBET
1D Price
Change %
SBET100%
-12.27%
MTN - SBET
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.93%
CNET - SBET
24%
Poorly correlated
-5.69%
NCMI - SBET
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.94%
FLL - SBET
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.29%
GAMB - SBET
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.14%
More