MTLS
Price
$4.95
Change
-$0.02 (-0.40%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
292.38M
46 days until earnings call
ZM
Price
$83.68
Change
+$0.89 (+1.08%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
25.04B
78 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MTLS vs ZM

Header iconMTLS vs ZM Comparison
Open Charts MTLS vs ZMBanner chart's image
Materialise
Price$4.95
Change-$0.02 (-0.40%)
Volume$99.02K
Capitalization292.38M
Zoom Communications
Price$83.68
Change+$0.89 (+1.08%)
Volume$2.87M
Capitalization25.04B
MTLS vs ZM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MTLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MTLS vs. ZM commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTLS is a Hold and ZM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (MTLS: $4.95 vs. ZM: $83.68)
Brand notoriety: MTLS: Not notable vs. ZM: Notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MTLS: 85% vs. ZM: 81%
Market capitalization -- MTLS: $292.38M vs. ZM: $25.04B
MTLS [@Packaged Software] is valued at $292.38M. ZM’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $25.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $309.84B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MTLS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileZM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MTLS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ZM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ZM is a better buy in the long-term than MTLS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MTLS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MTLS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • ZM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ZM is a better buy in the short-term than MTLS.

Price Growth

MTLS (@Packaged Software) experienced а -3.13% price change this week, while ZM (@Packaged Software) price change was +2.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

MTLS is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

ZM is expected to report earnings on Nov 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.74% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZM($25B) has a higher market cap than MTLS($292M). MTLS has higher P/E ratio than ZM: MTLS (47.17) vs ZM (22.02). ZM YTD gains are higher at: 2.536 vs. MTLS (-29.688). ZM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 983M vs. MTLS (32.1M). ZM has more cash in the bank: 7.79B vs. MTLS (117M). MTLS has less debt than ZM: MTLS (53.7M) vs ZM (61.5M). ZM has higher revenues than MTLS: ZM (4.7B) vs MTLS (266M).
MTLSZMMTLS / ZM
Capitalization292M25B1%
EBITDA32.1M983M3%
Gain YTD-29.6882.536-1,170%
P/E Ratio47.1722.02214%
Revenue266M4.7B6%
Total Cash117M7.79B2%
Total Debt53.7M61.5M87%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTLS vs ZM: Fundamental Ratings
MTLS
ZM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7322
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8962
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7647
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1062
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ZM's Valuation (71) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as MTLS (86) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ZM’s stock grew similarly to MTLS’s over the last 12 months.

ZM's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as MTLS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ZM’s stock grew similarly to MTLS’s over the last 12 months.

ZM's SMR Rating (62) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as MTLS (89) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ZM’s stock grew similarly to MTLS’s over the last 12 months.

ZM's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as MTLS (76) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ZM’s stock grew similarly to MTLS’s over the last 12 months.

MTLS's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ZM (62) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that MTLS’s stock grew somewhat faster than ZM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MTLSZM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MTLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HUSIF0.560.02
+3.97%
Nicola Mining Inc.
ZEOX1.530.02
+1.32%
Zeo ScientifiX Inc.
GMWKF210.000.50
+0.24%
Games Workshop Group
HAYPY8.07N/A
N/A
Hays PLC
SHECY14.83-0.08
-0.54%
Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.

MTLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTLS has been loosely correlated with NICE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MTLS jumps, then NICE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTLS
1D Price
Change %
MTLS100%
-0.40%
NICE - MTLS
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.25%
ONTF - MTLS
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.26%
ZM - MTLS
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
AVPT - MTLS
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.93%
AMWL - MTLS
36%
Loosely correlated
+3.87%
More

ZM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZM has been loosely correlated with PCOR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZM jumps, then PCOR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZM
1D Price
Change %
ZM100%
+1.08%
PCOR - ZM
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.39%
HUBS - ZM
53%
Loosely correlated
+5.00%
PATH - ZM
53%
Loosely correlated
+5.90%
DT - ZM
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
DOCU - ZM
52%
Loosely correlated
+4.75%
More