Advertisement
MTLK vs SBHGF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTLK is a Hold and SBHGF is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MTLK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSBHGF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- MTLK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SBHGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MTLK’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBHGF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MTLK’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
- SBHGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
MTLK (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SBHGF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +2.85% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +82.89%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Conglomerates (+0.43% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
| MTLK | SBHGF | MTLK / SBHGF | |
| Capitalization | 784K | 13.6B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -43K | 235B | -0% |
| Gain YTD | -31.567 | 63.892 | -49% |
| P/E Ratio | 54.35 | 11.67 | 466% |
| Revenue | 0 | 1.31T | - |
| Total Cash | 4.35M | 4.87T | 0% |
| Total Debt | 350K | 5.12T | 0% |
MTLK | SBHGF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 65 Fair valued | 30 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 29 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 72 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | 70 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SBHGF's Valuation (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTLK (65). This means that SBHGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTLK’s over the last 12 months.
SBHGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MTLK (100). This means that SBHGF’s stock grew significantly faster than MTLK’s over the last 12 months.
SBHGF's SMR Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as MTLK (90). This means that SBHGF’s stock grew similarly to MTLK’s over the last 12 months.
SBHGF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as MTLK (62). This means that SBHGF’s stock grew similarly to MTLK’s over the last 12 months.
SBHGF's P/E Growth Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as MTLK (91). This means that SBHGF’s stock grew similarly to MTLK’s over the last 12 months.
| MTLK | SBHGF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 42% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 28% | 3 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 36% | 3 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 41% | 3 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 41% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 20 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 37% | 3 days ago 67% |
Advertisement
MTLK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MTLK and RMHI have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MTLK and RMHI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MTLK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTLK | 100% | N/A | ||
| RMHI - MTLK | 21% Poorly correlated | +16.18% | ||
| SITS - MTLK | 6% Poorly correlated | -7.41% | ||
| SBHGF - MTLK | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.35% | ||
| NGRC - MTLK | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LGYV - MTLK | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SBHGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SBHGF and STJO have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SBHGF and STJO's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SBHGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBHGF | 100% | -0.35% | ||
| STJO - SBHGF | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MTLK - SBHGF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ORXCF - SBHGF | 1% Poorly correlated | -6.47% | ||
| TGLO - SBHGF | 1% Poorly correlated | -6.70% | ||
| LGYV - SBHGF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||