MTLK
Price
$0.30
Change
+$0.02 (+7.14%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Capitalization
783.77K
SBHGF
Price
$36.50
Change
+$0.28 (+0.77%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
10.59B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MTLK vs SBHGF

Header iconMTLK vs SBHGF Comparison
Open Charts MTLK vs SBHGFBanner chart's image
Metalink
Price$0.30
Change+$0.02 (+7.14%)
Volume$300
Capitalization783.77K
SBI Holdings
Price$36.50
Change+$0.28 (+0.77%)
Volume$624
Capitalization10.59B
MTLK vs SBHGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MTLK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBHGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MTLK vs. SBHGF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTLK is a Hold and SBHGF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (MTLK: $0.30 vs. SBHGF: $36.50)
Brand notoriety: MTLK and SBHGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MTLK: 128% vs. SBHGF: 6%
Market capitalization -- MTLK: $783.77K vs. SBHGF: $10.59B
MTLK [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $783.77K. SBHGF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $10.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MTLK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSBHGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MTLK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SBHGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBHGF is a better buy in the long-term than MTLK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MTLK’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBHGF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MTLK’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SBHGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MTLK is a better buy in the short-term than SBHGF.

Price Growth

MTLK (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SBHGF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +4.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.38%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.67% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBHGF($10.6B) has a higher market cap than MTLK($784K). MTLK has higher P/E ratio than SBHGF: MTLK (54.35) vs SBHGF (10.21). SBHGF YTD gains are higher at: 46.410 vs. MTLK (-31.567). SBHGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 235B vs. MTLK (-43K). SBHGF has more cash in the bank: 4.87T vs. MTLK (4.35M). MTLK has less debt than SBHGF: MTLK (350K) vs SBHGF (5.12T). SBHGF has higher revenues than MTLK: SBHGF (1.31T) vs MTLK (0).
MTLKSBHGFMTLK / SBHGF
Capitalization784K10.6B0%
EBITDA-43K235B-0%
Gain YTD-31.56746.410-68%
P/E Ratio54.3510.21532%
Revenue01.31T-
Total Cash4.35M4.87T0%
Total Debt350K5.12T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTLK vs SBHGF: Fundamental Ratings
MTLK
SBHGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5098
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10036
SMR RATING
1..100
9171
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5838
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9386
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBHGF's Valuation (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTLK (66). This means that SBHGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTLK’s over the last 12 months.

SBHGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTLK (100). This means that SBHGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTLK’s over the last 12 months.

SBHGF's SMR Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as MTLK (91). This means that SBHGF’s stock grew similarly to MTLK’s over the last 12 months.

SBHGF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as MTLK (58). This means that SBHGF’s stock grew similarly to MTLK’s over the last 12 months.

SBHGF's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as MTLK (93). This means that SBHGF’s stock grew similarly to MTLK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MTLKSBHGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MTLK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBHGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BNTC13.170.43
+3.38%
Benitec Biopharma
AMWD56.61-0.07
-0.12%
American Woodmark Corp
CAI26.54-0.18
-0.67%
Caris Life Sciences Inc
SHFS2.28-0.02
-0.74%
SHF Holdings Inc
MAMO2.79-0.04
-1.41%
Massimo Group

MTLK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MTLK and RMHI have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MTLK and RMHI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTLK
1D Price
Change %
MTLK100%
N/A
RMHI - MTLK
21%
Poorly correlated
+35.14%
SITS - MTLK
6%
Poorly correlated
-13.46%
SBHGF - MTLK
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
NGRC - MTLK
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.23%
LGYV - MTLK
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SBHGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SBHGF and STJO have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SBHGF and STJO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBHGF
1D Price
Change %
SBHGF100%
+0.77%
STJO - SBHGF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTLK - SBHGF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ORXCF - SBHGF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGLO - SBHGF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LGYV - SBHGF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More