Advertisement
MTEX vs UL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTEX is a StrongBuy and UL is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MTEX’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- MTEX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- UL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MTEX’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MTEX’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- UL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
MTEX (@Food Distributors) experienced а -0.79% price change this week, while UL (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +2.35% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was -0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.86%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +1.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.50%.
Reported Earning Dates
UL is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food Distributors (-0.33% weekly)Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.
@Household/Personal Care (+1.15% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
| MTEX | UL | MTEX / UL | |
| Capitalization | 14.2M | 149B | 0% |
| EBITDA | 1.33M | 11.3B | 0% |
| Gain YTD | -8.121 | 5.734 | -142% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.99 | 23.26 | 34% |
| Revenue | 110M | 59.8B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 7.14M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 8.1M | N/A | - |
MTEX | UL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 23 | 26 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 16 Undervalued | 29 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 56 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 30 | 40 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MTEX's Valuation (16) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as UL (29) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that MTEX’s stock grew similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.
UL's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTEX (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that UL’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTEX’s over the last 12 months.
MTEX's SMR Rating (95) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as UL (97) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that MTEX’s stock grew similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.
UL's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as MTEX (80) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that UL’s stock grew similarly to MTEX’s over the last 12 months.
MTEX's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as UL (40) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that MTEX’s stock grew similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.
| MTEX | UL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 38% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 34% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 43% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 40% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 40% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 42% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 75% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 49% |
Advertisement
MTEX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MTEX and EWCZ have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MTEX and EWCZ's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MTEX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTEX | 100% | -0.92% | ||
| EWCZ - MTEX | 14% Poorly correlated | -3.91% | ||
| COTY - MTEX | 11% Poorly correlated | -2.47% | ||
| PG - MTEX | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.39% | ||
| UL - MTEX | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.55% | ||
| UNFI - MTEX | 8% Poorly correlated | +2.63% | ||
More | ||||
UL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UL has been loosely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UL jumps, then PG could also see price increases.