MTEM
Price
$0.61
Change
+$0.29 (+90.62%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
NURPF
Price
$9.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 8 closing price
Ad is loading...

MTEM vs NURPF

Header iconMTEM vs NURPF Comparison
Open Charts MTEM vs NURPFBanner chart's image
Molecular Templates
Price$0.61
Change+$0.29 (+90.62%)
Volume$331.49M
CapitalizationN/A
Neuren Pharmaceuticals
Price$9.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4K
CapitalizationN/A
MTEM vs NURPF Comparison Chart
Loading...
MTEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MTEM vs. NURPF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTEM is a StrongSell and NURPF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (MTEM: $0.61 vs. NURPF: $9.50)
Brand notoriety: MTEM and NURPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Biotechnology industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MTEM: 2632% vs. NURPF: 266%
Market capitalization -- MTEM: $4.02M vs. NURPF: $1.47B
MTEM [@Biotechnology] is valued at $4.02M. NURPF’s [@Biotechnology] market capitalization is $1.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $475.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Biotechnology] industry is $2.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MTEM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNURPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MTEM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NURPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NURPF is a better buy in the long-term than MTEM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MTEM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MTEM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

MTEM (@Biotechnology) experienced а +55.10% price change this week, while NURPF (@Biotechnology) price change was +12.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was -2.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

MTEM is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Biotechnology (-2.07% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NURPF($1.47B) has a higher market cap than MTEM($4.02M). NURPF YTD gains are higher at: -44.052 vs. MTEM (-91.365).
MTEMNURPFMTEM / NURPF
Capitalization4.02M1.47B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-91.365-44.052207%
P/E RatioN/A15.10-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash1.43MN/A-
Total Debt9.08MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTEM vs NURPF: Fundamental Ratings
MTEM
NURPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9397
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10043
SMR RATING
1..100
10095
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9846
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5580
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MTEM's Valuation (39) in the Biotechnology industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NURPF (72) in the null industry. This means that MTEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than NURPF’s over the last 12 months.

NURPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTEM (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that NURPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTEM’s over the last 12 months.

NURPF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as MTEM (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that NURPF’s stock grew similarly to MTEM’s over the last 12 months.

NURPF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTEM (98) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that NURPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTEM’s over the last 12 months.

MTEM's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as NURPF (80) in the null industry. This means that MTEM’s stock grew similarly to NURPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MTEM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MTEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X90584.1640002628.351600
+2.99%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA330.241.75
+0.53%
Tesla
AAPL225.120.89
+0.40%
Apple
SPY597.190.29
+0.05%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.46-0.38
-1.42%
GameStop Corp

MTEM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTEM has been loosely correlated with MLLCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MTEM jumps, then MLLCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTEM
1D Price
Change %
MTEM100%
-2.81%
MLLCF - MTEM
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NKGN - MTEM
32%
Poorly correlated
-5.00%
NURPF - MTEM
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FULC - MTEM
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.20%
BMNDF - MTEM
24%
Poorly correlated
-20.33%
More

NURPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NURPF has been loosely correlated with LBPH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NURPF jumps, then LBPH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NURPF
1D Price
Change %
NURPF100%
N/A
LBPH - NURPF
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
MTEM - NURPF
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.81%
ASPHF - NURPF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCRT - NURPF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
IMAB - NURPF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.89%
More