Advertisement
MTD vs PROF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTD is a Hold and PROF is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MTD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePROF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- MTD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PROF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MTD’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PROF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MTD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PROF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
MTD (@Medical Specialties) experienced а +4.91% price change this week, while PROF (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +0.73% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was +4.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.45%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -2.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.73%.
Reported Earning Dates
MTD is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.
PROF is expected to report earnings on Aug 14, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical Specialties (+4.25% weekly)Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.
@Medical/Nursing Services (-2.03% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| MTD | PROF | MTD / PROF | |
| Capitalization | 25.9B | 169M | 15,325% |
| EBITDA | 1.22B | -35.5M | -3,425% |
| Gain YTD | 2.639 | -26.232 | -10% |
| P/E Ratio | 31.86 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 3.87B | 11.9M | 32,496% |
| Total Cash | 61.8M | 46.4M | 133% |
| Total Debt | 2.18B | 4.88M | 44,727% |
MTD | PROF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 99 Overvalued | 44 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 3 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 75 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 15 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PROF's Valuation (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTD (99) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that PROF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTD’s over the last 12 months.
MTD's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PROF (100) in the null industry. This means that MTD’s stock grew somewhat faster than PROF’s over the last 12 months.
MTD's SMR Rating (3) in the Medical Specialties industry is significantly better than the same rating for PROF (98) in the null industry. This means that MTD’s stock grew significantly faster than PROF’s over the last 12 months.
MTD's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as PROF (61) in the null industry. This means that MTD’s stock grew similarly to PROF’s over the last 12 months.
MTD's P/E Growth Rating (75) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as PROF (100) in the null industry. This means that MTD’s stock grew similarly to PROF’s over the last 12 months.
| MTD | PROF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 52% | 4 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 61% | 6 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 86% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QLV | 69.42 | 0.40 | +0.58% |
| FlexShares US Quality Low Vol ETF | |||
| MFSV | 25.18 | 0.13 | +0.51% |
| MFS Active Value ETF | |||
| VGM | 9.62 | 0.02 | +0.21% |
| Invesco Trust Investment Grade Municipals | |||
| APRH | 24.95 | 0.03 | +0.12% |
| Innovator Premium Income 20 Bar ETF -Apr | |||
| FDL | 42.32 | N/A | N/A |
| First Trust Morningstar Div Leaders ETF | |||
MTD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTD has been closely correlated with A. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTD jumps, then A could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MTD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTD | 100% | +1.54% | ||
| A - MTD | 84% Closely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| RVTY - MTD | 79% Closely correlated | +0.44% | ||
| TMO - MTD | 76% Closely correlated | +1.32% | ||
| WAT - MTD | 74% Closely correlated | +1.15% | ||
| BRKR - MTD | 71% Closely correlated | -2.34% | ||
More | ||||
PROF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PROF and MTD have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PROF and MTD's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PROF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PROF | 100% | -2.29% | ||
| MTD - PROF | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.54% | ||
| NYXH - PROF | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.07% | ||
| A - PROF | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.56% | ||
| QTRX - PROF | 24% Poorly correlated | -13.79% | ||
| CATX - PROF | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.38% | ||
More | ||||