MTB
Price
$221.57
Change
+$0.13 (+0.06%)
Updated
Jan 30 closing price
Capitalization
34.05B
73 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TFC
Price
$51.42
Change
+$0.10 (+0.19%)
Updated
Jan 30 closing price
Capitalization
64.92B
75 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MTB vs TFC

Header iconMTB vs TFC Comparison
Open Charts MTB vs TFCBanner chart's image
M&T Bank
Price$221.57
Change+$0.13 (+0.06%)
Volume$1.52M
Capitalization34.05B
Truist Financial
Price$51.42
Change+$0.10 (+0.19%)
Volume$12.03M
Capitalization64.92B
MTB vs TFC Comparison Chart in %
MTB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MTB vs. TFC commentary
Feb 01, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTB is a StrongBuy and TFC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 01, 2026
Stock price -- (MTB: $221.57 vs. TFC: $51.42)
Brand notoriety: MTB and TFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MTB: 143% vs. TFC: 140%
Market capitalization -- MTB: $34.05B vs. TFC: $64.92B
MTB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $34.05B. TFC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $64.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $155.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $9.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MTB’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTFC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MTB’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • TFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MTB and TFC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MTB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TFC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MTB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MTB is a better buy in the short-term than TFC.

Price Growth

MTB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.62% price change this week, while TFC (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

MTB is expected to report earnings on Apr 15, 2026.

TFC is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.22% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFC($64.9B) has a higher market cap than MTB($34.1B). TFC (13.46) and MTB (13.03) have similar P/E ratio . MTB YTD gains are higher at: 9.971 vs. TFC (4.491). TFC has more cash in the bank: 5.16B vs. MTB (2.13B). MTB has less debt than TFC: MTB (14.9B) vs TFC (71.1B). TFC has higher revenues than MTB: TFC (20.1B) vs MTB (9.56B).
MTBTFCMTB / TFC
Capitalization34.1B64.9B53%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD9.9714.491222%
P/E Ratio13.0313.4697%
Revenue9.56B20.1B48%
Total Cash2.13B5.16B41%
Total Debt14.9B71.1B21%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTB vs TFC: Fundamental Ratings
MTB
TFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8118
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3272
SMR RATING
1..100
64
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1724
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5837
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TFC's Valuation (65) in the null industry is in the same range as MTB (72) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that TFC’s stock grew similarly to MTB’s over the last 12 months.

MTB's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TFC (72) in the null industry. This means that MTB’s stock grew somewhat faster than TFC’s over the last 12 months.

TFC's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as MTB (6) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that TFC’s stock grew similarly to MTB’s over the last 12 months.

MTB's Price Growth Rating (17) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as TFC (24) in the null industry. This means that MTB’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

TFC's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as MTB (58) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that TFC’s stock grew similarly to MTB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MTBTFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MTB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SKF26.730.13
+0.48%
ProShares UltraShort Financials
FFA21.950.03
+0.16%
First Trust Enhanced Equity Income Fund
AUGM34.180.02
+0.05%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Max Buffr ETF - Aug
AFMC35.99-0.27
-0.74%
First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF
CGDG36.48-0.30
-0.82%
Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF

MTB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTB has been closely correlated with TFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTB jumps, then TFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTB
1D Price
Change %
MTB100%
+0.06%
TFC - MTB
90%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
CFG - MTB
90%
Closely correlated
-0.80%
HBAN - MTB
89%
Closely correlated
+1.10%
PNC - MTB
89%
Closely correlated
-0.52%
USB - MTB
89%
Closely correlated
-0.39%
More

TFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TFC has been closely correlated with CFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TFC jumps, then CFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TFC
1D Price
Change %
TFC100%
+0.19%
CFG - TFC
93%
Closely correlated
-0.80%
KEY - TFC
92%
Closely correlated
-0.51%
FNB - TFC
91%
Closely correlated
-0.28%
MTB - TFC
90%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
WBS - TFC
90%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
More