MTB
Price
$187.17
Change
+$3.43 (+1.87%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
29.25B
66 days until earnings call
RF
Price
$24.92
Change
+$0.28 (+1.14%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
22.24B
67 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MTB vs RF

Header iconMTB vs RF Comparison
Open Charts MTB vs RFBanner chart's image
M&T Bank
Price$187.17
Change+$3.43 (+1.87%)
Volume$811.02K
Capitalization29.25B
Regions Financial
Price$24.92
Change+$0.28 (+1.14%)
Volume$7.58M
Capitalization22.24B
MTB vs RF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MTB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MTB vs. RF commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTB is a Buy and RF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (MTB: $187.17 vs. RF: $24.92)
Brand notoriety: MTB: Not notable vs. RF: Notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MTB: 71% vs. RF: 62%
Market capitalization -- MTB: $29.25B vs. RF: $22.24B
MTB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $29.25B. RF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $22.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $173.23B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MTB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MTB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MTB and RF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MTB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MTB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MTB and RF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MTB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.18% price change this week, while RF (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

MTB is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2025.

RF is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.46% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTB($29.2B) has a higher market cap than RF($22.2B). MTB (12.13) and RF (11.64) have similar P/E ratio . RF YTD gains are higher at: 8.345 vs. MTB (1.006). RF has more cash in the bank: 3.29B vs. MTB (2.11B). RF has less debt than MTB: RF (6.02B) vs MTB (12B). MTB has higher revenues than RF: MTB (9.3B) vs RF (7.12B).
MTBRFMTB / RF
Capitalization29.2B22.2B132%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.0068.34512%
P/E Ratio12.1311.64104%
Revenue9.3B7.12B131%
Total Cash2.11B3.29B64%
Total Debt12B6.02B199%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTB vs RF: Fundamental Ratings
MTB
RF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3023
SMR RATING
1..100
67
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5628
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5052
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a29

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RF's Valuation (77) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MTB (98) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to MTB’s over the last 12 months.

RF's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MTB (30) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to MTB’s over the last 12 months.

MTB's SMR Rating (6) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RF (7) in the Major Banks industry. This means that MTB’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

RF's Price Growth Rating (28) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MTB (56) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to MTB’s over the last 12 months.

MTB's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RF (52) in the Major Banks industry. This means that MTB’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MTBRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MTB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SOXY52.441.04
+2.03%
YieldMax Target 12 Smcndctr Opt Inc ETF
GGZ13.730.11
+0.80%
Gabelli Global Small and Mid Cap Value Trust (The)
GSIE40.250.19
+0.47%
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® Intl Eq ETF
JANW35.460.11
+0.31%
AllianzIM US Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF
SOYB21.07-0.18
-0.85%
Teucrium Soybean Fund

MTB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTB has been closely correlated with RF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTB jumps, then RF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTB
1D Price
Change %
MTB100%
+1.87%
RF - MTB
91%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
FNB - MTB
90%
Closely correlated
+1.29%
FITB - MTB
90%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
CFG - MTB
89%
Closely correlated
+1.37%
PNC - MTB
89%
Closely correlated
+1.40%
More

RF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RF has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RF jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RF
1D Price
Change %
RF100%
+1.14%
FNB - RF
91%
Closely correlated
+1.29%
MTB - RF
91%
Closely correlated
+1.87%
FITB - RF
91%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
HBAN - RF
91%
Closely correlated
+1.39%
CFG - RF
90%
Closely correlated
+1.37%
More