MTB
Price
$189.48
Change
+$4.06 (+2.19%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
24 days until earnings call
RF
Price
$23.67
Change
-$0.10 (-0.42%)
Updated
Dec 23, 11:17 AM (EDT)
25 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MTB vs RF

Header iconMTB vs RF Comparison
Open Charts MTB vs RFBanner chart's image
M&T Bank
Price$189.48
Change+$4.06 (+2.19%)
Volume$3.38M
CapitalizationN/A
Regions Financial
Price$23.67
Change-$0.10 (-0.42%)
Volume$2.52K
CapitalizationN/A
MTB vs RF Comparison Chart
Loading...
MTB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MTB vs. RF commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTB is a Hold and RF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (MTB: $189.48 vs. RF: $23.77)
Brand notoriety: MTB: Not notable vs. RF: Notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MTB: 277% vs. RF: 355%
Market capitalization -- MTB: $24.23B vs. RF: $18.9B
MTB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $24.23B. RF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $18.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MTB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MTB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MTB and RF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MTB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MTB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RF is a better buy in the short-term than MTB.

Price Growth

MTB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.92% price change this week, while RF (@Regional Banks) price change was -5.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

MTB is expected to report earnings on Jan 16, 2025.

RF is expected to report earnings on Jan 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.72% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTB($24.2B) has a higher market cap than RF($18.9B). RF has higher P/E ratio than MTB: RF (9.74) vs MTB (9.07). MTB YTD gains are higher at: 42.767 vs. RF (28.353). RF has less debt than MTB: RF (2.33B) vs MTB (13.2B). MTB has higher revenues than RF: MTB (9.4B) vs RF (7.57B).
MTBRFMTB / RF
Capitalization24.2B18.9B128%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD42.76728.353151%
P/E Ratio9.079.7493%
Revenue9.4B7.57B124%
Total CashN/A1.55B-
Total Debt13.2B2.33B567%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTB vs RF: Fundamental Ratings
MTB
RF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4428
SMR RATING
1..100
67
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4547
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1619
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MTB's Valuation (70) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RF (77) in the Major Banks industry. This means that MTB’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

RF's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MTB (44) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to MTB’s over the last 12 months.

MTB's SMR Rating (6) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RF (7) in the Major Banks industry. This means that MTB’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

MTB's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RF (47) in the Major Banks industry. This means that MTB’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

MTB's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RF (19) in the Major Banks industry. This means that MTB’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MTBRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MTB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME29.820.82
+2.83%
GameStop Corp
AAPL254.494.70
+1.88%
Apple
SPY591.157.02
+1.20%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X95104.940000-2119.789000
-2.18%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA421.06-15.11
-3.46%
Tesla

MTB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTB has been closely correlated with RF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTB jumps, then RF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTB
1D Price
Change %
MTB100%
+2.19%
RF - MTB
86%
Closely correlated
+2.59%
CFG - MTB
84%
Closely correlated
+2.36%
SNV - MTB
83%
Closely correlated
+1.35%
FITB - MTB
83%
Closely correlated
+1.59%
PNFP - MTB
82%
Closely correlated
+1.16%
More

RF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RF has been closely correlated with HBAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RF jumps, then HBAN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RF
1D Price
Change %
RF100%
+2.59%
HBAN - RF
89%
Closely correlated
+2.58%
CFG - RF
88%
Closely correlated
+2.36%
PNFP - RF
87%
Closely correlated
+1.16%
HWC - RF
86%
Closely correlated
+2.12%
MTB - RF
86%
Closely correlated
+2.19%
More