MTAGF
Price
$4.96
Change
+$2.26 (+83.70%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
2.49B
PAHGF
Price
$3.26
Change
+$0.46 (+16.43%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
1.34B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MTAGF vs PAHGF

Header iconMTAGF vs PAHGF Comparison
Open Charts MTAGF vs PAHGFBanner chart's image
Ceconomy AG
Price$4.96
Change+$2.26 (+83.70%)
Volume$200
Capitalization2.49B
Pets at Home Group
Price$3.26
Change+$0.46 (+16.43%)
Volume$42.2K
Capitalization1.34B
MTAGF vs PAHGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MTAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAHGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MTAGF vs. PAHGF commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTAGF is a Hold and PAHGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (MTAGF: $4.96 vs. PAHGF: $3.26)
Brand notoriety: MTAGF and PAHGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MTAGF: 7% vs. PAHGF: 197%
Market capitalization -- MTAGF: $2.49B vs. PAHGF: $1.34B
MTAGF [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $2.49B. PAHGF’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $1.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $50.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $4.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MTAGF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePAHGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MTAGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PAHGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MTAGF is a better buy in the long-term than PAHGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MTAGF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAHGF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MTAGF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • PAHGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MTAGF is a better buy in the short-term than PAHGF.

Price Growth

MTAGF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PAHGF (@Specialty Stores) price change was -2.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.12%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-1.68% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTAGF($2.49B) has a higher market cap than PAHGF($1.34B). MTAGF has higher P/E ratio than PAHGF: MTAGF (423.39) vs PAHGF (12.80). MTAGF YTD gains are higher at: 59.496 vs. PAHGF (11.073). MTAGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 973M vs. PAHGF (241M). MTAGF has more cash in the bank: 1.02B vs. PAHGF (39.5M). PAHGF has less debt than MTAGF: PAHGF (380M) vs MTAGF (2.58B). MTAGF has higher revenues than PAHGF: MTAGF (22.8B) vs PAHGF (1.48B).
MTAGFPAHGFMTAGF / PAHGF
Capitalization2.49B1.34B185%
EBITDA973M241M404%
Gain YTD59.49611.073537%
P/E Ratio423.3912.803,308%
Revenue22.8B1.48B1,538%
Total Cash1.02B39.5M2,577%
Total Debt2.58B380M679%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTAGF vs PAHGF: Fundamental Ratings
MTAGF
PAHGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4098
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7594
SMR RATING
1..100
9179
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3756
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
182
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAHGF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as MTAGF (8). This means that PAHGF’s stock grew similarly to MTAGF’s over the last 12 months.

MTAGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as PAHGF (94). This means that MTAGF’s stock grew similarly to PAHGF’s over the last 12 months.

PAHGF's SMR Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as MTAGF (91). This means that PAHGF’s stock grew similarly to MTAGF’s over the last 12 months.

MTAGF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as PAHGF (56). This means that MTAGF’s stock grew similarly to PAHGF’s over the last 12 months.

MTAGF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PAHGF (82). This means that MTAGF’s stock grew significantly faster than PAHGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MTAGFPAHGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
8%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
13%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
15%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MTAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAHGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPISX69.540.35
+0.51%
Invesco S&P 500 Index R6
RAFCX42.940.20
+0.47%
American Funds AMCAP R3
KMVAX38.210.03
+0.08%
Kirr Marbach Partners Value
AVEGX50.83-0.17
-0.33%
Ave Maria Growth
GSGCX45.88-0.19
-0.41%
Goldman Sachs Equity Income C

MTAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTAGF has been loosely correlated with HZO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MTAGF jumps, then HZO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTAGF
1D Price
Change %
MTAGF100%
N/A
HZO - MTAGF
39%
Loosely correlated
-2.00%
ONEW - MTAGF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.05%
MTTRY - MTAGF
8%
Poorly correlated
-12.35%
PAHGF - MTAGF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTPTF - MTAGF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PAHGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAHGF has been loosely correlated with MRGO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PAHGF jumps, then MRGO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAHGF
1D Price
Change %
PAHGF100%
N/A
MRGO - PAHGF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CDNTF - PAHGF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
USSJY - PAHGF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SIETY - PAHGF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTTRY - PAHGF
9%
Poorly correlated
-12.35%
More