MTAGF
Price
$4.96
Change
+$2.26 (+83.70%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
2.49B
ONEW
Price
$16.11
Change
+$0.19 (+1.19%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
263.73M
47 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MTAGF vs ONEW

Header iconMTAGF vs ONEW Comparison
Open Charts MTAGF vs ONEWBanner chart's image
Ceconomy AG
Price$4.96
Change+$2.26 (+83.70%)
Volume$200
Capitalization2.49B
OneWater Marine
Price$16.11
Change+$0.19 (+1.19%)
Volume$122.72K
Capitalization263.73M
MTAGF vs ONEW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ONEW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MTAGF vs. ONEW commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTAGF is a Hold and ONEW is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (MTAGF: $4.96 vs. ONEW: $16.11)
Brand notoriety: MTAGF and ONEW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MTAGF: 56% vs. ONEW: 97%
Market capitalization -- MTAGF: $2.49B vs. ONEW: $263.73M
MTAGF [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $2.49B. ONEW’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $263.73M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $49.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $4.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MTAGF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileONEW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MTAGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • ONEW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MTAGF is a better buy in the long-term than ONEW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ONEW’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ONEW’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

MTAGF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ONEW (@Specialty Stores) price change was +3.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

ONEW is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+0.92% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTAGF($2.49B) has a higher market cap than ONEW($264M). MTAGF YTD gains are higher at: 59.496 vs. ONEW (-7.307). MTAGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 973M vs. ONEW (73.6M). MTAGF has more cash in the bank: 1.02B vs. ONEW (70.1M). ONEW has less debt than MTAGF: ONEW (990M) vs MTAGF (2.58B). MTAGF has higher revenues than ONEW: MTAGF (22.8B) vs ONEW (1.79B).
MTAGFONEWMTAGF / ONEW
Capitalization2.49B264M944%
EBITDA973M73.6M1,322%
Gain YTD59.496-7.307-814%
P/E Ratio422.36N/A-
Revenue22.8B1.79B1,274%
Total Cash1.02B70.1M1,452%
Total Debt2.58B990M261%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTAGF: Fundamental Ratings
MTAGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
40
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
81
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MTAGFONEW
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
13%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
14%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ONEW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KCDMY10.070.29
+2.97%
Kimberly-Clark de Mexico, S.A.B de C.V.
NTIOF108.030.25
+0.23%
National Bank of Canada
CFXTF0.20N/A
N/A
Conifex Timber Inc.
OSGCF13.66N/A
N/A
Osg Corp. Co. Ltd.
PLMJF11.29N/A
N/A
Plum Acquisition Corp. III

MTAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTAGF has been loosely correlated with HZO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MTAGF jumps, then HZO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTAGF
1D Price
Change %
MTAGF100%
N/A
HZO - MTAGF
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.75%
ONEW - MTAGF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.19%
MTTRY - MTAGF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.82%
PAHGF - MTAGF
6%
Poorly correlated
+3.81%
MTPTF - MTAGF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

ONEW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONEW has been loosely correlated with HZO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ONEW jumps, then HZO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ONEW
1D Price
Change %
ONEW100%
+1.19%
HZO - ONEW
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.75%
ASO - ONEW
54%
Loosely correlated
+4.29%
ABG - ONEW
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.14%
RUSHA - ONEW
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.88%
AN - ONEW
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
More