MTA
Price
$2.66
Change
-$0.18 (-6.34%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
284.03M
34 days until earnings call
OR
Price
$19.81
Change
-$1.17 (-5.58%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.04B
32 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MTA vs OR

Header iconMTA vs OR Comparison
Open Charts MTA vs ORBanner chart's image
Metalla Royalty & Streaming
Price$2.66
Change-$0.18 (-6.34%)
Volume$1.72K
Capitalization284.03M
Osisko Gold Royalties
Price$19.81
Change-$1.17 (-5.58%)
Volume$7.89K
Capitalization3.04B
MTA vs OR Comparison Chart
Loading...
MTA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 05, 2025
Stock price -- (MTA: $2.84 vs. OR: $20.98)
Brand notoriety: MTA and OR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MTA: 124% vs. OR: 133%
Market capitalization -- MTA: $284.03M vs. OR: $3.04B
MTA [@Precious Metals] is valued at $284.03M. OR’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MTA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MTA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OR is a better buy in the long-term than MTA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MTA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OR’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MTA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OR is a better buy in the short-term than MTA.

Price Growth

MTA (@Precious Metals) experienced а -7.49% price change this week, while OR (@Precious Metals) price change was -0.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -1.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

MTA is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2025.

OR is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-1.62% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OR($3.04B) has a higher market cap than MTA($284M). OR YTD gains are higher at: 15.912 vs. MTA (13.147). OR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 41.5M vs. MTA (-917K). OR has more cash in the bank: 75.9M vs. MTA (14.1M). MTA has less debt than OR: MTA (14.6M) vs OR (200M). OR has higher revenues than MTA: OR (247M) vs MTA (4.6M).
MTAORMTA / OR
Capitalization284M3.04B9%
EBITDA-917K41.5M-2%
Gain YTD13.14715.91283%
P/E RatioN/A86.33-
Revenue4.6M247M2%
Total Cash14.1M75.9M19%
Total Debt14.6M200M7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTA vs OR: Fundamental Ratings
MTA
OR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7014
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10015
SMR RATING
1..100
9191
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5040
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10037
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MTA's Valuation (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OR (91). This means that MTA’s stock grew somewhat faster than OR’s over the last 12 months.

OR's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MTA (100). This means that OR’s stock grew significantly faster than MTA’s over the last 12 months.

OR's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as MTA (91). This means that OR’s stock grew similarly to MTA’s over the last 12 months.

OR's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as MTA (50). This means that OR’s stock grew similarly to MTA’s over the last 12 months.

OR's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTA (100). This means that OR’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MTAOR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MTA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X83102.830000617.109400
+0.75%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY536.70-27.82
-4.93%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA267.28-15.48
-5.47%
Tesla
GME21.10-1.59
-7.01%
GameStop Corp
AAPL203.19-20.70
-9.25%
Apple

MTA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTA has been closely correlated with CDE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTA jumps, then CDE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTA
1D Price
Change %
MTA100%
-0.70%
CDE - MTA
70%
Closely correlated
-4.52%
MAG - MTA
69%
Closely correlated
-1.94%
ASM - MTA
69%
Closely correlated
-3.53%
SA - MTA
67%
Closely correlated
-1.34%
OR - MTA
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
More

OR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OR has been closely correlated with CDE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OR jumps, then CDE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OR
1D Price
Change %
OR100%
-0.24%
CDE - OR
66%
Closely correlated
-4.52%
MAG - OR
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.94%
SA - OR
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.34%
SAND - OR
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
IAG - OR
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.93%
More