MTA
Price
$2.66
Change
-$0.13 (-4.66%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
99 days until earnings call
NFGC
Price
$1.53
Change
-$0.05 (-3.16%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
126 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MTA vs NFGC

Header iconMTA vs NFGC Comparison
Open Charts MTA vs NFGCBanner chart's image
Metalla Royalty & Streaming
Price$2.66
Change-$0.13 (-4.66%)
Volume$4.21K
CapitalizationN/A
New Found Gold
Price$1.53
Change-$0.05 (-3.16%)
Volume$6.91K
CapitalizationN/A
MTA vs NFGC Comparison Chart
Loading...
MTA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NFGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MTA vs. NFGC commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTA is a Hold and NFGC is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (MTA: $2.79 vs. NFGC: $1.58)
Brand notoriety: MTA and NFGC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MTA: 104% vs. NFGC: 51%
Market capitalization -- MTA: $284.03M vs. NFGC: $696.88M
MTA [@Precious Metals] is valued at $284.03M. NFGC’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $696.88M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MTA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNFGC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MTA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NFGC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MTA and NFGC are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MTA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NFGC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MTA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NFGC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NFGC is a better buy in the short-term than MTA.

Price Growth

MTA (@Precious Metals) experienced а +0.36% price change this week, while NFGC (@Precious Metals) price change was -8.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -3.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

MTA is expected to report earnings on Mar 28, 2025.

NFGC is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-3.68% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NFGC($697M) has a higher market cap than MTA($284M). MTA YTD gains are higher at: -9.416 vs. NFGC (-54.857). MTA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -917K vs. NFGC (-78.92M). NFGC has more cash in the bank: 57.3M vs. MTA (14.1M). NFGC has less debt than MTA: NFGC (158K) vs MTA (14.6M). MTA has higher revenues than NFGC: MTA (4.6M) vs NFGC (0).
MTANFGCMTA / NFGC
Capitalization284M697M41%
EBITDA-917K-78.92M1%
Gain YTD-9.416-54.85717%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue4.6M0-
Total Cash14.1M57.3M25%
Total Debt14.6M158K9,241%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTA: Fundamental Ratings
MTA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
14
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
74
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
41

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MTANFGC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MTA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NFGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME31.261.82
+6.18%
GameStop Corp
TSLA479.8616.84
+3.64%
Tesla
AAPL253.482.44
+0.97%
Apple
BTC.X106140.600000110.890625
+0.10%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY604.29-2.50
-0.41%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust

MTA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTA has been closely correlated with MAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTA jumps, then MAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTA
1D Price
Change %
MTA100%
+0.72%
MAG - MTA
69%
Closely correlated
-0.61%
SAND - MTA
69%
Closely correlated
+0.18%
CDE - MTA
67%
Closely correlated
+0.16%
GATO - MTA
66%
Closely correlated
-0.87%
SA - MTA
65%
Loosely correlated
-3.99%
More

NFGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NFGC has been loosely correlated with MAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NFGC jumps, then MAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NFGC
1D Price
Change %
NFGC100%
-1.86%
MAG - NFGC
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.61%
MTA - NFGC
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
SILV - NFGC
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
EQX - NFGC
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.37%
GATO - NFGC
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.87%
More