MT
Price
$24.00
Change
+$0.71 (+3.05%)
Updated
Jan 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
18.23B
13 days until earnings call
USAP
Price
$44.99
Change
+$0.41 (+0.92%)
Updated
Jan 22 closing price
Capitalization
423.58M
Ad is loading...

MT vs USAP

Header iconMT vs USAP Comparison
Open Charts MT vs USAPBanner chart's image
ArcelorMittal
Price$24.00
Change+$0.71 (+3.05%)
Volume$19.81K
Capitalization18.23B
Universal Stainless & Alloy Products
Price$44.99
Change+$0.41 (+0.92%)
Volume$677.56K
Capitalization423.58M
MT vs USAP Comparison Chart
Loading...
MT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MT vs. USAP commentary
Jan 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MT is a Hold and USAP is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 24, 2025
Stock price -- (MT: $24.00 vs. USAP: $44.99)
Brand notoriety: MT: Notable vs. USAP: Not notable
Both companies represent the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MT: 139% vs. USAP: 355%
Market capitalization -- MT: $18.23B vs. USAP: $423.58M
MT [@Steel] is valued at $18.23B. USAP’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $423.58M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $28.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $4.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUSAP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • USAP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MT is a better buy in the long-term than USAP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USAP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • USAP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MT is a better buy in the short-term than USAP.

Price Growth

MT (@Steel) experienced а +3.54% price change this week, while USAP (@Steel) price change was +1.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was +0.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

MT is expected to report earnings on May 02, 2025.

USAP is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Steel (+0.41% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MT($18.2B) has a higher market cap than USAP($424M). MT has higher P/E ratio than USAP: MT (23.57) vs USAP (16.48). MT YTD gains are higher at: 3.761 vs. USAP (2.180). MT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.45B vs. USAP (60.7M). MT has more cash in the bank: 5.09B vs. USAP (1K). USAP has less debt than MT: USAP (69.3M) vs MT (11.3B). MT has higher revenues than USAP: MT (62.3B) vs USAP (327M).
MTUSAPMT / USAP
Capitalization18.2B424M4,292%
EBITDA2.45B60.7M4,028%
Gain YTD3.7612.180173%
P/E Ratio23.5716.48143%
Revenue62.3B327M19,052%
Total Cash5.09B1K509,400,000%
Total Debt11.3B69.3M16,306%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MT vs USAP: Fundamental Ratings
MT
USAP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
823
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
616
SMR RATING
1..100
9065
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5239
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
398
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MT's Valuation (12) in the Steel industry is somewhat better than the same rating for USAP (74). This means that MT’s stock grew somewhat faster than USAP’s over the last 12 months.

USAP's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Steel industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MT (61). This means that USAP’s stock grew somewhat faster than MT’s over the last 12 months.

USAP's SMR Rating (65) in the Steel industry is in the same range as MT (90). This means that USAP’s stock grew similarly to MT’s over the last 12 months.

USAP's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Steel industry is in the same range as MT (52). This means that USAP’s stock grew similarly to MT’s over the last 12 months.

MT's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Steel industry is significantly better than the same rating for USAP (98). This means that MT’s stock grew significantly faster than USAP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MTUSAP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
70%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME28.330.68
+2.46%
GameStop Corp
SPY609.753.31
+0.55%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X103960.170000307.109380
+0.30%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
AAPL223.66-0.17
-0.08%
Apple
TSLA412.38-2.73
-0.66%
Tesla

MT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MT has been loosely correlated with SID. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MT jumps, then SID could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MT
1D Price
Change %
MT100%
+3.05%
SID - MT
57%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NUE - MT
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.02%
CMC - MT
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
GGB - MT
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
TX - MT
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.75%
More

USAP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that USAP and RS have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that USAP and RS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To USAP
1D Price
Change %
USAP100%
+0.92%
RS - USAP
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.01%
MTUS - USAP
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.49%
ASTL - USAP
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.47%
MT - USAP
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.67%
TX - USAP
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
More