MT
Price
$27.80
Change
-$0.20 (-0.71%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
21.74B
69 days until earnings call
TX
Price
$29.39
Change
-$0.40 (-1.34%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
5.77B
66 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MT vs TX

Header iconMT vs TX Comparison
Open Charts MT vs TXBanner chart's image
ArcelorMittal
Price$27.80
Change-$0.20 (-0.71%)
Volume$1.92M
Capitalization21.74B
Ternium SA
Price$29.39
Change-$0.40 (-1.34%)
Volume$290.06K
Capitalization5.77B
MT vs TX Comparison Chart
Loading...
MT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MT vs. TX commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MT is a StrongBuy and TX is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (MT: $28.89 vs. TX: $31.37)
Brand notoriety: MT: Notable vs. TX: Not notable
Both companies represent the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MT: 91% vs. TX: 115%
Market capitalization -- MT: $21.74B vs. TX: $5.77B
MT [@Steel] is valued at $21.74B. TX’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $5.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $31.75B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $5.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTX’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TX is a better buy in the long-term than MT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TX’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MT and TX are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MT (@Steel) experienced а +5.55% price change this week, while TX (@Steel) price change was +5.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

MT is expected to report earnings on May 02, 2025.

TX is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Steel (+0.01% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MT($21.7B) has a higher market cap than TX($5.77B). TX has higher P/E ratio than MT: TX (78.42) vs MT (16.45). MT YTD gains are higher at: 24.903 vs. TX (7.875). MT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.45B vs. TX (1.97B). MT has more cash in the bank: 5.09B vs. TX (3.86B). TX has less debt than MT: TX (2.4B) vs MT (11.3B). MT has higher revenues than TX: MT (62.3B) vs TX (18.7B).
MTTXMT / TX
Capitalization21.7B5.77B376%
EBITDA2.45B1.97B124%
Gain YTD24.9037.875316%
P/E Ratio16.4578.4221%
Revenue62.3B18.7B333%
Total Cash5.09B3.86B132%
Total Debt11.3B2.4B470%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MT vs TX: Fundamental Ratings
MT
TX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2010
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3848
SMR RATING
1..100
9090
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4056
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
853
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TX's Valuation (5) in the Steel industry is in the same range as MT (13). This means that TX’s stock grew similarly to MT’s over the last 12 months.

MT's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the Steel industry is in the same range as TX (48). This means that MT’s stock grew similarly to TX’s over the last 12 months.

MT's SMR Rating (90) in the Steel industry is in the same range as TX (90). This means that MT’s stock grew similarly to TX’s over the last 12 months.

MT's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Steel industry is in the same range as TX (56). This means that MT’s stock grew similarly to TX’s over the last 12 months.

TX's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Steel industry is significantly better than the same rating for MT (85). This means that TX’s stock grew significantly faster than MT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MTTX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY611.491.79
+0.29%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL244.47-0.13
-0.05%
Apple
GME26.97-0.03
-0.11%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X95539.550000-233.835940
-0.24%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA354.11-1.73
-0.49%
Tesla

MT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MT has been loosely correlated with SID. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MT jumps, then SID could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MT
1D Price
Change %
MT100%
+1.12%
SID - MT
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.92%
NUE - MT
52%
Loosely correlated
+3.45%
CMC - MT
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.05%
TX - MT
48%
Loosely correlated
+3.46%
GGB - MT
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

TX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TX has been loosely correlated with SID. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TX jumps, then SID could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TX
1D Price
Change %
TX100%
+3.46%
SID - TX
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.92%
GGB - TX
49%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MT - TX
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.12%
NUE - TX
46%
Loosely correlated
+3.45%
CMC - TX
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.05%
More