Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSSVX vs WCMNX
MSSVX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts MSSVX vs WCMNX
AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth N
Price$8.59
Change-$0.04 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.81M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.84
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.65M
MSSVX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSSVX vs. WCMNX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSSVX is a Hold and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSSVX has more cash in the bank: 80.8M vs. WCMNX (44.7M). MSSVX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: MSSVX (4.53) vs WCMNX (0.00). MSSVX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: MSSVX (16 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than MSSVX (1.54). MSSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 234.00 vs. WCMNX (83.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSSVX: WCMNX (1000) vs MSSVX (2000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.04 vs. MSSVX (6.18). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : -5.40 vs. MSSVX (-16.05).
| MSSVX | WCMNX | MSSVX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.24 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 2.04 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.734 | 9.062 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.8M | 44.7M | 181% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.18 | 7.04 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.96 | 32.95 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.05 | -5.40 | 297% |
| Returns for 10 years | -16.28 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement