Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSSVX vs WCMNX
MSSVX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts MSSVX vs WCMNX
AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth N
Price$9.08
Change+$0.57 (+6.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets83.87M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$14.42
Change+$0.82 (+6.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.08M
MSSVX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSSVX vs. WCMNX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSSVX is a StrongBuy and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSSVX has more cash in the bank: 83.9M vs. WCMNX (47.1M). MSSVX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: MSSVX (1.65) vs WCMNX (0.00). MSSVX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: MSSVX (16 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than MSSVX (1.54). MSSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 290.00 vs. WCMNX (83.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSSVX: WCMNX (1000) vs MSSVX (2000). MSSVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.37 vs. WCMNX (8.34). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : -6.49 vs. MSSVX (-19.47).
| MSSVX | WCMNX | MSSVX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.24 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 2.04 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.456 | 6.421 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 83.9M | 47.1M | 178% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.37 | 8.34 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.93 | 18.68 | 182% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.47 | -6.49 | 300% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.85 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement