Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSSVX vs WCMNX
MSSVX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts MSSVX vs WCMNX
AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth N
Price$8.41
Change-$0.04 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.08M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.59
Change-$0.03 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.97M
MSSVX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSSVX vs. WCMNX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSSVX is a Hold and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSSVX has more cash in the bank: 78.1M vs. WCMNX (43M). MSSVX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: MSSVX (4.73) vs WCMNX (0.00). MSSVX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: MSSVX (16 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than MSSVX (1.54). MSSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 234.00 vs. WCMNX (83.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSSVX: WCMNX (1000) vs MSSVX (2000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.42 vs. MSSVX (-1.52). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 11.12 vs. MSSVX (-2.07).
| MSSVX | WCMNX | MSSVX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.24 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 2.04 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.456 | 7.092 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 78.1M | 43M | 182% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.73 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.52 | 1.42 | -107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.52 | 32.97 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.07 | 11.12 | -19% |
| Returns for 10 years | -34.93 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement