Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSSVX vs WCMLX
MSSVX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts MSSVX vs WCMLX
AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth N
Price$9.08
Change+$0.57 (+6.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets83.87M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.64
Change+$0.83 (+6.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.08M
MSSVX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSSVX vs. WCMLX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSSVX is a StrongBuy and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSSVX has more cash in the bank: 83.9M vs. WCMLX (47.1M). MSSVX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: MSSVX (1.65) vs WCMLX (0.00). MSSVX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: MSSVX (16 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than MSSVX (1.54). MSSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 290.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). MSSVX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: MSSVX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). MSSVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.37 vs. WCMLX (8.52). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -5.30 vs. MSSVX (-19.47).
| MSSVX | WCMLX | MSSVX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.99 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 1.79 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.456 | 6.395 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 83.9M | 47.1M | 178% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.37 | 8.52 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.93 | 19.51 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.47 | -5.30 | 367% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.85 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement