Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSSVX vs WCMLX
MSSVX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts MSSVX vs WCMLX
AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth N
Price$8.63
Change+$0.03 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.18M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.08
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.65M
MSSVX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSSVX vs. WCMLX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSSVX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSSVX has more cash in the bank: 81.2M vs. WCMLX (44.7M). MSSVX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: MSSVX (4.53) vs WCMLX (0.00). MSSVX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: MSSVX (16 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than MSSVX (1.54). MSSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 234.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). MSSVX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: MSSVX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.14 vs. MSSVX (7.34). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -4.02 vs. MSSVX (-15.66).
| MSSVX | WCMLX | MSSVX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.99 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 1.79 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.241 | 9.487 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 81.2M | 44.7M | 182% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.34 | 8.14 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.50 | 33.08 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.66 | -4.02 | 389% |
| Returns for 10 years | -33.76 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement