Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSSVX vs WCMLX
MSSVX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts MSSVX vs WCMLX
AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth N
Price$8.41
Change-$0.04 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.08M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.79
Change-$0.04 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.97M
MSSVX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSSVX vs. WCMLX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSSVX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSSVX has more cash in the bank: 78.1M vs. WCMLX (43M). MSSVX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: MSSVX (4.73) vs WCMLX (0.00). MSSVX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: MSSVX (16 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than MSSVX (1.54). MSSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 234.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). MSSVX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: MSSVX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.70 vs. MSSVX (-1.52). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 12.48 vs. MSSVX (-2.07).
| MSSVX | WCMLX | MSSVX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.99 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 1.79 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.456 | 7.232 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 78.1M | 43M | 182% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.73 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.52 | 1.70 | -89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.52 | 33.88 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.07 | 12.48 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | -34.93 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement