Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSSVX vs NRGSX
MSSVX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts MSSVX vs NRGSX
AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth N
Price$8.20
Change-$0.29 (-3.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets77.83M
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$61.95
Change-$0.68 (-1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.43B
MSSVX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSSVX vs. NRGSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSSVX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.43B vs. MSSVX (77.8M). MSSVX pays higher dividends than NRGSX: MSSVX (4.57) vs NRGSX (0.07). MSSVX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: MSSVX (16 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). MSSVX (1.54) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). MSSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 234.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSSVX: NRGSX (0) vs MSSVX (2000). MSSVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.43 vs. NRGSX (-13.93). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : -6.57 vs. MSSVX (-7.45).
| MSSVX | NRGSX | MSSVX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.74 | 176% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 0.74 | 208% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.468 | -4.162 | -179% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 77.8M | 8.43B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.57 | 0.07 | 6,907% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.43 | -13.93 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.43 | -1.73 | -1,755% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.45 | -6.57 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | -33.53 | 10.77 | -311% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement