Advertisement
MSSMY vs SSHPF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSSMY is a StrongBuy and SSHPF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MSSMY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSSHPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- MSSMY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SSHPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MSSMY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SSHPF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MSSMY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SSHPF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
MSSMY (@Tools & Hardware) experienced а +3.12% price change this week, while SSHPF (@Industrial Specialties) price change was +14.03% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tools & Hardware industry was -0.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.90%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Specialties industry was +3.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +102.18%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Tools & Hardware (-0.13% weekly)Tools & Hardware industry includes companies that manufacture security products, storage cabinets, steel rules and tapes, calipers, shoe hook fasteners, lumber, structural materials and other related supplies. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., Snap-on Incorporated and L.S. Starrett Company are some of the largest, established players in this industry. The industry is also seeing rapid growth in online sales. The proliferation of do-it-yourself (DIY) projects has boosted industry demand. But oil price volatility poses potential risks to this industry, particularly to e-commerce companies which spend on services of shipping companies, which might alter charges based on oil price movements.
@Industrial Specialties (+3.00% weekly)Companies in the industrial specialties industry process basic materials and minerals into various specialty products, such as flat and safety glass, fire retardant products, paints and coatings. Examples of companies operating in this industry are Sherwin-Williams Company, PPG Industries, Inc. and RPM International Inc.
| MSSMY | SSHPF | MSSMY / SSHPF | |
| Capitalization | 4.3B | 60.3M | 7,131% |
| EBITDA | 62.3B | 28.1M | 221,708% |
| Gain YTD | 4.063 | 42.723 | 10% |
| P/E Ratio | 17.86 | 136.59 | 13% |
| Revenue | 386B | 1.02B | 37,917% |
| Total Cash | 145B | 46.3M | 313,175% |
| Total Debt | N/A | 470M | - |
SSHPF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 15 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 15 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| MSSMY | SSHPF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 42% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 38% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 57% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 75% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| HGLB | 8.80 | 0.09 | +1.03% |
| Highland Global Allocation Fund | |||
| BBAG | 46.57 | 0.24 | +0.51% |
| JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Aggt Bond ETF | |||
| IVEG | 21.59 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares Emergent Food and AgTech Multisector ETF | |||
| BELT | 32.04 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares U.S. Select Equity Active ETF | |||
| SARK | 33.02 | -0.16 | -0.48% |
| Tradr 1X Short Innovation Daily ETF | |||
MSSMY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MSSMY and SMCAY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MSSMY and SMCAY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MSSMY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSSMY | 100% | +3.99% | ||
| SMCAY - MSSMY | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.42% | ||
| FANUY - MSSMY | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.29% | ||
| SBGSY - MSSMY | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.91% | ||
| SBGSF - MSSMY | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.19% | ||
| THKLY - MSSMY | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.09% | ||
More | ||||
SSHPF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SSHPF and MDMXF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SSHPF and MDMXF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SSHPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSHPF | 100% | +14.03% | ||
| MDMXF - SSHPF | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LASE - SSHPF | 26% Poorly correlated | -3.76% | ||
| GRNWF - SSHPF | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WRTBF - SSHPF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MSSMY - SSHPF | 5% Poorly correlated | +3.99% | ||
More | ||||