Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSSCX vs WCMLX
MSSCX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts MSSCX vs WCMLX
AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth I
Price$9.38
Change-$0.04 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.08M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.79
Change-$0.04 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.97M
MSSCX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSSCX vs. WCMLX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSSCX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSSCX has more cash in the bank: 78.1M vs. WCMLX (43M). MSSCX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: MSSCX (4.52) vs WCMLX (0.00). MSSCX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: MSSCX (28 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than MSSCX (1.23). MSSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 234.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). MSSCX (100000) and WCMLX (100000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.70 vs. MSSCX (-0.79). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 12.48 vs. MSSCX (3.11).
| MSSCX | WCMLX | MSSCX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.99 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.79 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.834 | 7.232 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 100000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 78.1M | 43M | 182% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.52 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.79 | 1.70 | -46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.34 | 33.88 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.11 | 12.48 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | -28.49 | N/A | - |