Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSSCX vs WCMLX
MSSCX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts MSSCX vs WCMLX
AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth I
Price$10.16
Change+$0.68 (+7.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets84.5M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.64
Change+$0.83 (+6.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.08M
MSSCX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSSCX vs. WCMLX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSSCX is a StrongBuy and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSSCX has more cash in the bank: 84.5M vs. WCMLX (47.1M). MSSCX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: MSSCX (1.75) vs WCMLX (0.00). MSSCX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: MSSCX (28 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than MSSCX (1.23). MSSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 290.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). MSSCX (100000) and WCMLX (100000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MSSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.07 vs. WCMLX (8.52). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -5.30 vs. MSSCX (-15.06).
| MSSCX | WCMLX | MSSCX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.99 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.79 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.513 | 6.395 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 100000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 84.5M | 47.1M | 179% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.75 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.07 | 8.52 | 153% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.08 | 19.51 | 185% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.06 | -5.30 | 284% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.16 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement