Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSSCX vs NRGSX
MSSCX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts MSSCX vs NRGSX
AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth I
Price$9.38
Change-$0.04 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.08M
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$62.80
Change+$0.25 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.71B
MSSCX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSSCX vs. NRGSX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSSCX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.71B vs. MSSCX (78.1M). MSSCX pays higher dividends than NRGSX: MSSCX (4.52) vs NRGSX (0.06). MSSCX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: MSSCX (28 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). MSSCX (1.23) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). MSSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 234.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSSCX: NRGSX (0) vs MSSCX (100000). MSSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.79 vs. NRGSX (-10.12). MSSCX return over 5 years is better than : 3.11 vs. NRGSX (-2.32).
| MSSCX | NRGSX | MSSCX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.74 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.74 | 166% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.834 | -3.902 | -175% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 78.1M | 8.71B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.52 | 0.06 | 6,967% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.79 | -10.12 | 8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.34 | 5.90 | 734% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.11 | -2.32 | -134% |
| Returns for 10 years | -28.49 | 10.24 | -278% |