Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSPRX vs RGACX
MSPRX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts MSPRX vs RGACX
Morgan Stanley Inst Advantage C
Price$25.07
Change+$0.11 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets213.99M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.62
Change+$0.46 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
MSPRX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSPRX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSPRX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. MSPRX (214M). MSPRX pays higher dividends than RGACX: MSPRX (0.53) vs RGACX (0.07). MSPRX was incepted earlier than RGACX: MSPRX (10 years) vs RGACX (23 years). MSPRX (2.04) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). MSPRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSPRX: RGACX (250) vs MSPRX (1000). MSPRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 62.64 vs. RGACX (21.05). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 42.51 vs. MSPRX (-29.66).
| MSPRX | RGACX | MSPRX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.94 | 207% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 0.94 | 217% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.054 | 16.155 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 214M | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.07 | 742% |
| Returns for 1 year | 62.64 | 21.05 | 298% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.72 | 51.55 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.66 | 42.51 | -70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.40 | 97.10 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement