MSMGF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
20.31M
MTLFF
Price
$0.14
Change
+$0.01 (+7.69%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.51M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MSMGF vs MTLFF

Header iconMSMGF vs MTLFF Comparison
Open Charts MSMGF vs MTLFFBanner chart's image
Grid Metals
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$63.57K
Capitalization20.31M
Metallis Resources
Price$0.14
Change+$0.01 (+7.69%)
Volume$156.02K
Capitalization2.51M
MSMGF vs MTLFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MSMGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MSMGF vs. MTLFF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSMGF is a Hold and MTLFF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (MSMGF: $0.03 vs. MTLFF: $0.14)
Brand notoriety: MSMGF and MTLFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MSMGF: 112% vs. MTLFF: 348%
Market capitalization -- MSMGF: $20.31M vs. MTLFF: $2.51M
MSMGF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $20.31M. MTLFF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.51M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MSMGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMTLFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MSMGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MTLFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MSMGF is a better buy in the long-term than MTLFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MSMGF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTLFF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MSMGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • MTLFF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MSMGF and MTLFF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MSMGF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +0.68% price change this week, while MTLFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +8.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSMGF($20.3M) has a higher market cap than MTLFF($2.51M). MSMGF YTD gains are higher at: 18.400 vs. MTLFF (-19.540). MTLFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -673.85K vs. MSMGF (-10.01M). MSMGF has more cash in the bank: 8.52M vs. MTLFF (1.09M). MSMGF has less debt than MTLFF: MSMGF (74.7K) vs MTLFF (98.9K). MSMGF (0) and MTLFF (0) have equivalent revenues.
MSMGFMTLFFMSMGF / MTLFF
Capitalization20.3M2.51M808%
EBITDA-10.01M-673.85K1,485%
Gain YTD18.400-19.540-94%
P/E Ratio65.79N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash8.52M1.09M783%
Total Debt74.7K98.9K76%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MSMGF vs MTLFF: Fundamental Ratings
MSMGF
MTLFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
99100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5944
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a48

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MTLFF's Valuation (87) in the null industry is in the same range as MSMGF (99). This means that MTLFF’s stock grew similarly to MSMGF’s over the last 12 months.

MTLFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MSMGF (100). This means that MTLFF’s stock grew similarly to MSMGF’s over the last 12 months.

MSMGF's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as MTLFF (100). This means that MSMGF’s stock grew similarly to MTLFF’s over the last 12 months.

MTLFF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as MSMGF (59). This means that MTLFF’s stock grew similarly to MSMGF’s over the last 12 months.

MSMGF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MTLFF (100). This means that MSMGF’s stock grew significantly faster than MTLFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MSMGFMTLFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MSMGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PIAC0.05N/A
N/A
Princeton Capital Corporation
CYDX0.25N/A
N/A
CYduct Diagnostics Inc.
KPTCY6.85N/A
N/A
Kansai Paint Co., Ltd.
PSSWF23.79N/A
N/A
PSI SOFTWARE AG
BOUYY9.17-0.03
-0.33%
Bouygues SA

MSMGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MSMGF and KCCFF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MSMGF and KCCFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSMGF
1D Price
Change %
MSMGF100%
N/A
KCCFF - MSMGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.58%
MTLFF - MSMGF
8%
Poorly correlated
+5.26%
DMXCF - MSMGF
8%
Poorly correlated
+3.03%
MMLTF - MSMGF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLGCF - MSMGF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MTLFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MTLFF and TROUF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MTLFF and TROUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTLFF
1D Price
Change %
MTLFF100%
+5.26%
TROUF - MTLFF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ERVFF - MTLFF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ORMNF - MTLFF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LTRBF - MTLFF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATMTF - MTLFF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More