MSLVF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
2.17M
QDROF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.01 (-33.33%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
614.48K
Interact to see
Advertisement

MSLVF vs QDROF

Header iconMSLVF vs QDROF Comparison
Open Charts MSLVF vs QDROFBanner chart's image
FIRST ANDES SILVER
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$11.33K
Capitalization2.17M
Quadro Resources
Price$0.02
Change-$0.01 (-33.33%)
Volume$200
Capitalization614.48K
MSLVF vs QDROF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MSLVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QDROF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MSLVF vs. QDROF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSLVF is a Hold and QDROF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (MSLVF: $0.06 vs. QDROF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: MSLVF and QDROF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MSLVF: 40% vs. QDROF: 2%
Market capitalization -- MSLVF: $2.17M vs. QDROF: $614.48K
MSLVF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $2.17M. QDROF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $614.48K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MSLVF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileQDROF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MSLVF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • QDROF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MSLVF is a better buy in the long-term than QDROF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MSLVF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QDROF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MSLVF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • QDROF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QDROF is a better buy in the short-term than MSLVF.

Price Growth

MSLVF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -9.38% price change this week, while QDROF (@Precious Metals) price change was -5.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSLVF($2.17M) has a higher market cap than QDROF($614K). MSLVF YTD gains are higher at: 123.105 vs. QDROF (2.882). QDROF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -97.77K vs. MSLVF (-1.23M). QDROF has more cash in the bank: 709K vs. MSLVF (31.9K). MSLVF (0) and QDROF (0) have equivalent revenues.
MSLVFQDROFMSLVF / QDROF
Capitalization2.17M614K353%
EBITDA-1.23M-97.77K1,255%
Gain YTD123.1052.8824,271%
P/E Ratio1.29N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash31.9K709K4%
Total Debt54.7KN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MSLVFQDROF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MSLVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QDROF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GLBZ4.980.12
+2.47%
Glen Burnie Bancorp
MDB209.920.72
+0.34%
MongoDB
AUNA6.34-0.01
-0.16%
Auna SA
ALE63.88-0.12
-0.19%
ALLETE
GBFH34.96-0.90
-2.51%
Gbank Financial Holdings Inc

MSLVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MSLVF and QDROF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MSLVF and QDROF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSLVF
1D Price
Change %
MSLVF100%
N/A
QDROF - MSLVF
23%
Poorly correlated
-5.95%
FFOXF - MSLVF
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.53%
ELRFF - MSLVF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.64%
DC - MSLVF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AUST - MSLVF
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.25%
More

QDROF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QDROF and AMQFF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QDROF and AMQFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QDROF
1D Price
Change %
QDROF100%
-5.95%
AMQFF - QDROF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
MSLVF - QDROF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMAUF - QDROF
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.09%
EXNRF - QDROF
8%
Poorly correlated
-2.37%
PMCOF - QDROF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
More