MSIF
Price
$12.75
Change
-$0.02 (-0.16%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
598.11M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WHF
Price
$6.53
Change
-$0.01 (-0.15%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
151.38M
21 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MSIF vs WHF

Header iconMSIF vs WHF Comparison
Open Charts MSIF vs WHFBanner chart's image
MSC Income Fund
Price$12.75
Change-$0.02 (-0.16%)
Volume$678.61K
Capitalization598.11M
WhiteHorse Finance
Price$6.53
Change-$0.01 (-0.15%)
Volume$149.79K
Capitalization151.38M
MSIF vs WHF Comparison Chart in %
MSIF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MSIF vs. WHF commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSIF is a Buy and WHF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (MSIF: $12.77 vs. WHF: $6.54)
Brand notoriety: MSIF and WHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MSIF: 331% vs. WHF: 63%
Market capitalization -- MSIF: $598.11M vs. WHF: $151.38M
MSIF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $598.11M. WHF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $151.38M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $166.91B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MSIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MSIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MSIF is a better buy in the long-term than WHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MSIF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WHF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MSIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MSIF is a better buy in the short-term than WHF.

Price Growth

MSIF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -4.70% price change this week, while WHF (@Investment Managers) price change was -4.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

WHF is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.43% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSIF($598M) has a higher market cap than WHF($151M). WHF has higher P/E ratio than MSIF: WHF (15.15) vs MSIF (7.16). MSIF YTD gains are higher at: -2.816 vs. WHF (-5.899). WHF has less debt than MSIF: WHF (324M) vs MSIF (529M). MSIF has higher revenues than WHF: MSIF (81.5M) vs WHF (15.9M).
MSIFWHFMSIF / WHF
Capitalization598M151M396%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.816-5.89948%
P/E Ratio7.1615.1547%
Revenue81.5M15.9M513%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt529M324M163%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WHF: Fundamental Ratings
WHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
63
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
76
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
76
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
85
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MSIFWHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
49%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MSIF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WOLWF21.17N/A
N/A
Woolworths Group Limited
ZDPY0.40N/A
N/A
Zoned Properties, Inc.
YITYY1.35N/A
N/A
YIT OYJ
NNCHF34.10N/A
N/A
Nissan Chemical Corporation
NWINF0.95-0.01
-0.61%
Naked Wines PLC

MSIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSIF has been loosely correlated with OBDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MSIF jumps, then OBDC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSIF
1D Price
Change %
MSIF100%
-1.54%
OBDC - MSIF
42%
Loosely correlated
-3.48%
CRBG - MSIF
42%
Loosely correlated
-3.34%
WHF - MSIF
41%
Loosely correlated
-3.54%
BCSF - MSIF
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.17%
BBDC - MSIF
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.45%
More

WHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WHF has been loosely correlated with GSBD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WHF jumps, then GSBD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WHF
1D Price
Change %
WHF100%
-3.54%
GSBD - WHF
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.65%
BCSF - WHF
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.17%
TSLX - WHF
46%
Loosely correlated
-2.57%
CGBD - WHF
46%
Loosely correlated
-2.48%
TPVG - WHF
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.87%
More