MSIF
Price
$12.75
Change
-$0.02 (-0.16%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
598.11M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VINP
Price
$12.35
Change
-$0.25 (-1.98%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
781.7M
41 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MSIF vs VINP

Header iconMSIF vs VINP Comparison
Open Charts MSIF vs VINPBanner chart's image
MSC Income Fund
Price$12.75
Change-$0.02 (-0.16%)
Volume$678.61K
Capitalization598.11M
Vinci Compass Investments
Price$12.35
Change-$0.25 (-1.98%)
Volume$81.74K
Capitalization781.7M
MSIF vs VINP Comparison Chart in %
MSIF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VINP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MSIF vs. VINP commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSIF is a Buy and VINP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (MSIF: $12.75 vs. VINP: $12.35)
Brand notoriety: MSIF and VINP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MSIF: 268% vs. VINP: 172%
Market capitalization -- MSIF: $598.11M vs. VINP: $781.7M
MSIF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $598.11M. VINP’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $781.7M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $166.91B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MSIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVINP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MSIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VINP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, VINP is a better buy in the long-term than MSIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MSIF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VINP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MSIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • VINP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VINP is a better buy in the short-term than MSIF.

Price Growth

MSIF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -5.13% price change this week, while VINP (@Investment Managers) price change was -4.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

VINP is expected to report earnings on Mar 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.60% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VINP($782M) has a higher market cap than MSIF($598M). VINP has higher P/E ratio than MSIF: VINP (29.21) vs MSIF (7.16). MSIF YTD gains are higher at: -2.968 vs. VINP (-5.291). MSIF has less debt than VINP: MSIF (529M) vs VINP (883M). VINP has higher revenues than MSIF: VINP (665M) vs MSIF (81.5M).
MSIFVINPMSIF / VINP
Capitalization598M782M76%
EBITDAN/A278M-
Gain YTD-2.968-5.29156%
P/E Ratio7.1629.2125%
Revenue81.5M665M12%
Total CashN/A1.67B-
Total Debt529M883M60%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MSIFVINP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MSIF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VINP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CRCRX9.790.13
+1.35%
NYLI CBRE Real Estate Class C
TRICX4.87N/A
N/A
Catalyst/SMH Total Return Income C
GTEYX51.35-0.21
-0.41%
Gateway Y
MSPIX74.81-0.38
-0.51%
NYLI S&P 500 Index Class I
TINGX26.00-0.43
-1.63%
Thornburg International Growth I

MSIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSIF has been loosely correlated with STEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MSIF jumps, then STEP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSIF
1D Price
Change %
MSIF100%
-0.16%
STEP - MSIF
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.49%
OBDC - MSIF
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.35%
CRBG - MSIF
42%
Loosely correlated
+3.65%
WHF - MSIF
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
VINP - MSIF
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.98%
More

VINP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VINP has been loosely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VINP jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VINP
1D Price
Change %
VINP100%
-1.98%
BN - VINP
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.80%
PAX - VINP
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.96%
BAM - VINP
57%
Loosely correlated
+4.88%
CRBG - VINP
56%
Loosely correlated
+3.65%
PFG - VINP
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.16%
More