MSHXF
Price
$42.85
Change
+$8.84 (+25.99%)
Updated
May 14 closing price
Capitalization
1.16B
OGOFF
Price
$0.22
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
15.08M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MSHXF vs OGOFF

Header iconMSHXF vs OGOFF Comparison
Open Charts MSHXF vs OGOFFBanner chart's image
Mitsubishi Shokuhin
Price$42.85
Change+$8.84 (+25.99%)
Volume$5.4K
Capitalization1.16B
Organto Foods
Price$0.22
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$30K
Capitalization15.08M
MSHXF vs OGOFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MSHXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OGOFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MSHXF vs. OGOFF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSHXF is a Hold and OGOFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (MSHXF: $42.85 vs. OGOFF: $0.22)
Brand notoriety: MSHXF and OGOFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MSHXF: 147% vs. OGOFF: 341%
Market capitalization -- MSHXF: $1.16B vs. OGOFF: $15.08M
MSHXF [@Food Distributors] is valued at $1.16B. OGOFF’s [@Food Distributors] market capitalization is $15.08M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Distributors] industry ranges from $40.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Distributors] industry is $5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MSHXF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileOGOFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MSHXF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • OGOFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MSHXF is a better buy in the long-term than OGOFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MSHXF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OGOFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MSHXF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • OGOFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MSHXF is a better buy in the short-term than OGOFF.

Price Growth

MSHXF (@Food Distributors) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while OGOFF (@Food Distributors) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was +3.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +53.12%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Distributors (+3.10% weekly)

Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSHXF($1.17B) has a higher market cap than OGOFF($15.1M). OGOFF YTD gains are higher at: 201.999 vs. MSHXF (32.253). MSHXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 25.1B vs. OGOFF (-9.17M). MSHXF has more cash in the bank: 583M vs. OGOFF (2.17M). OGOFF has less debt than MSHXF: OGOFF (9.76M) vs MSHXF (6.6B). MSHXF has higher revenues than OGOFF: MSHXF (1.95T) vs OGOFF (22.6M).
MSHXFOGOFFMSHXF / OGOFF
Capitalization1.17B15.1M7,715%
EBITDA25.1B-9.17M-273,695%
Gain YTD32.253201.99916%
P/E Ratio8.72N/A-
Revenue1.95T22.6M8,637,168%
Total Cash583M2.17M26,916%
Total Debt6.6B9.76M67,544%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MSHXF vs OGOFF: Fundamental Ratings
MSHXF
OGOFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
18100
SMR RATING
1..100
43100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4134
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
25100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a33

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MSHXF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for OGOFF (94). This means that MSHXF’s stock grew significantly faster than OGOFF’s over the last 12 months.

MSHXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for OGOFF (100). This means that MSHXF’s stock grew significantly faster than OGOFF’s over the last 12 months.

MSHXF's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OGOFF (100). This means that MSHXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OGOFF’s over the last 12 months.

OGOFF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as MSHXF (41). This means that OGOFF’s stock grew similarly to MSHXF’s over the last 12 months.

MSHXF's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for OGOFF (100). This means that MSHXF’s stock grew significantly faster than OGOFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MSHXFOGOFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
6%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MSHXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OGOFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ETST0.190.04
+25.00%
Earth Science Tech, Inc.
TLGRF0.270.01
+1.89%
TALGA GROUP LTD.
NCLTY9.460.05
+0.58%
Nitori Holdings Co., Ltd.
SHALF0.56N/A
N/A
Shangri-La Asia Ltd.
CTGSP2.93N/A
N/A
Connecticut Natural Gas Corp.

MSHXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MSHXF and BPPPF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MSHXF and BPPPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSHXF
1D Price
Change %
MSHXF100%
N/A
BPPPF - MSHXF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JRONY - MSHXF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.65%
MTTWF - MSHXF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OGOFF - MSHXF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KARNF - MSHXF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

OGOFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OGOFF and MCLE have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OGOFF and MCLE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OGOFF
1D Price
Change %
OGOFF100%
N/A
MCLE - OGOFF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCSHF - OGOFF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CERGF - OGOFF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACITF - OGOFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSHXF - OGOFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More