Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSHPX vs RGEBX
MSHPX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts MSHPX vs RGEBX
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence R6
Price$13.13
Change-$2.40 (-15.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$75.85
Change-$9.36 (-10.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
MSHPX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSHPX vs. RGEBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSHPX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. MSHPX (5.64M). MSHPX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: MSHPX (0.60) vs RGEBX (0.00). MSHPX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: MSHPX (6 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). MSHPX (10.50) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). MSHPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHPX: RGEBX (250) vs MSHPX (5000000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.80 vs. MSHPX (-1.86). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 9.88 vs. MSHPX (-6.43).
| MSHPX | RGEBX | MSHPX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.08 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.50 | 1.08 | 972% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.690 | -1.057 | -65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.64M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.86 | 1.80 | -103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.29 | 41.63 | 15% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.43 | 9.88 | -65% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 110.02 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement