Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSHPX vs RGACX
MSHPX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts MSHPX vs RGACX
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence R6
Price$15.01
Change+$0.08 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.5M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$85.71
Change+$0.36 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.05B
MSHPX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSHPX vs. RGACX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSHPX is a Hold and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. MSHPX (5.5M). MSHPX pays higher dividends than RGACX: MSHPX (2.26) vs RGACX (0.07). MSHPX was incepted earlier than RGACX: MSHPX (6 years) vs RGACX (24 years). MSHPX (10.50) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). MSHPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHPX: RGACX (250) vs MSHPX (5000000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.46 vs. MSHPX (1.49). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 29.83 vs. MSHPX (3.77).
| MSHPX | RGACX | MSHPX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.94 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.50 | 0.94 | 1,117% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.641 | 18.558 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.5M | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.26 | 0.07 | 3,308% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.49 | 6.46 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.00 | 60.09 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.77 | 29.83 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 89.90 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement