Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSHOX vs RGEBX
MSHOX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts MSHOX vs RGEBX
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence C
Price$12.34
Change-$2.34 (-15.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.76M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$75.85
Change-$9.36 (-10.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
MSHOX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSHOX vs. RGEBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSHOX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. MSHOX (5.76M). MSHOX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . MSHOX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: MSHOX (6 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). MSHOX (13.89) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). MSHOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHOX: RGEBX (250) vs MSHOX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.80 vs. MSHOX (-3.82). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 9.88 vs. MSHOX (-13.43).
| MSHOX | RGEBX | MSHOX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.08 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 13.89 | 1.08 | 1,286% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.570 | -1.057 | -54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.76M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.82 | 1.80 | -212% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.00 | 41.63 | 2% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.43 | 9.88 | -136% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 110.02 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers