Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSHOX vs RGEBX
MSHOX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts MSHOX vs RGEBX
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence C
Price$13.11
Change+$0.07 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.95M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$77.85
Change-$0.83 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
MSHOX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSHOX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSHOX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. MSHOX (5.95M). MSHOX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . MSHOX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: MSHOX (6 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). MSHOX (13.89) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). MSHOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHOX: RGEBX (250) vs MSHOX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.68 vs. MSHOX (4.96). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 16.94 vs. MSHOX (-6.94).
| MSHOX | RGEBX | MSHOX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.08 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 13.89 | 1.08 | 1,286% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.846 | 1.552 | 441% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.95M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.96 | 8.68 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.93 | 53.46 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.94 | 16.94 | -41% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 111.87 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers