Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSHOX vs RGAGX
MSHOX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts MSHOX vs RGAGX
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence C
Price$12.39
Change+$0.05 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$79.78
Change-$9.68 (-10.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
MSHOX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSHOX vs. RGAGX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSHOX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. MSHOX (5.64M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than MSHOX: RGAGX (0.55) vs MSHOX (0.00). MSHOX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: MSHOX (6 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). MSHOX (13.89) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). MSHOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHOX: RGAGX (250) vs MSHOX (1000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.12 vs. MSHOX (-3.82). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 15.21 vs. MSHOX (-13.43).
| MSHOX | RGAGX | MSHOX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.29 | 672% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 13.89 | 0.29 | 4,790% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.570 | -0.981 | -58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.64M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.55 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.82 | 3.12 | -123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.00 | 46.56 | 2% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.43 | 15.21 | -88% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 123.51 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement