Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSHNX vs RGACX
MSHNX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts MSHNX vs RGACX
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence A
Price$13.14
Change+$0.04 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.71M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$78.34
Change+$0.23 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
MSHNX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSHNX vs. RGACX commentary
Dec 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSHNX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. MSHNX (5.71M). MSHNX pays higher dividends than RGACX: MSHNX (2.00) vs RGACX (0.07). MSHNX was incepted earlier than RGACX: MSHNX (6 years) vs RGACX (24 years). MSHNX (7.95) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). MSHNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHNX: RGACX (250) vs MSHNX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.45 vs. MSHNX (2.50). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 20.43 vs. MSHNX (-6.48).
| MSHNX | RGACX | MSHNX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.93 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 7.95 | 0.93 | 855% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.369 | 8.821 | 50% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.71M | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.00 | 0.07 | 2,922% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.50 | 5.45 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.10 | 63.36 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.48 | 20.43 | -32% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 92.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement