Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSHNX vs RGABX
MSHNX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts MSHNX vs RGABX
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence A
Price$14.94
Change+$0.23 (+1.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.53M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$79.23
Change+$0.47 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
MSHNX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSHNX vs. RGABX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSHNX is a Hold and RGABX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. MSHNX (5.53M). MSHNX pays higher dividends than RGABX: MSHNX (2.00) vs RGABX (0.00). MSHNX was incepted earlier than RGABX: MSHNX (6 years) vs RGABX (24 years). MSHNX (7.95) is less costly to investors than RGABX (1.39). MSHNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHNX: RGABX (250) vs MSHNX (1000). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.29 vs. MSHNX (0.97). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 24.39 vs. MSHNX (1.32).
| MSHNX | RGABX | MSHNX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.39 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 7.95 | 1.39 | 572% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.283 | 18.082 | 90% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.53M | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.97 | 5.29 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.16 | 55.80 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.32 | 24.39 | 5% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 77.97 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement