Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSHNX vs RGABX
MSHNX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts MSHNX vs RGABX
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence A
Price$13.66
Change+$0.07 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.91M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$71.52
Change-$0.77 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
MSHNX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSHNX vs. RGABX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSHNX is a Hold and RGABX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. MSHNX (5.91M). MSHNX pays higher dividends than RGABX: MSHNX (0.29) vs RGABX (0.00). MSHNX was incepted earlier than RGABX: MSHNX (6 years) vs RGABX (24 years). MSHNX (7.95) is less costly to investors than RGABX (1.38). MSHNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RGABX (32.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHNX: RGABX (250) vs MSHNX (1000). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.49 vs. MSHNX (6.31). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 12.41 vs. MSHNX (-3.13).
| MSHNX | RGABX | MSHNX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.38 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 7.95 | 1.38 | 576% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.255 | 2.626 | 238% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.91M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.31 | 8.49 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.26 | 50.79 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.13 | 12.41 | -25% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 102.27 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement