Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSHNX vs RGABX
MSHNX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts MSHNX vs RGABX
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence A
Price$12.87
Change-$2.36 (-15.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.76M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$69.68
Change-$9.36 (-11.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
MSHNX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSHNX vs. RGABX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSHNX is a Hold and RGABX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. MSHNX (5.76M). MSHNX pays higher dividends than RGABX: MSHNX (0.29) vs RGABX (0.00). MSHNX was incepted earlier than RGABX: MSHNX (6 years) vs RGABX (24 years). MSHNX (7.95) is less costly to investors than RGABX (1.38). MSHNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RGABX (32.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHNX: RGABX (250) vs MSHNX (1000). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.62 vs. MSHNX (-2.51). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 5.53 vs. MSHNX (-8.83).
| MSHNX | RGABX | MSHNX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.38 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 7.95 | 1.38 | 576% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.625 | -1.079 | -58% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.76M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.51 | 0.62 | -405% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.54 | 37.71 | 12% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.83 | 5.53 | -160% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 98.35 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement