Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSHMX vs RGEBX
MSHMX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts MSHMX vs RGEBX
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence I
Price$13.10
Change-$2.40 (-15.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.76M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$75.85
Change-$9.36 (-10.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
MSHMX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSHMX vs. RGEBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSHMX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. MSHMX (5.76M). MSHMX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: MSHMX (0.56) vs RGEBX (0.00). MSHMX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: MSHMX (6 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). MSHMX (7.16) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). MSHMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHMX: RGEBX (250) vs MSHMX (1000000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.80 vs. MSHMX (-1.98). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 9.88 vs. MSHMX (-6.73).
| MSHMX | RGEBX | MSHMX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.08 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 7.16 | 1.08 | 663% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.614 | -1.057 | -58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.76M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.98 | 1.80 | -110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.04 | 41.63 | 15% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.73 | 9.88 | -68% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 110.02 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement