Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSHMX vs RGACX
MSHMX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts MSHMX vs RGACX
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence I
Price$13.10
Change-$2.40 (-15.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.76M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$76.64
Change-$9.33 (-10.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
MSHMX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSHMX vs. RGACX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSHMX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. MSHMX (5.76M). MSHMX pays higher dividends than RGACX: MSHMX (0.56) vs RGACX (0.00). MSHMX was incepted earlier than RGACX: MSHMX (6 years) vs RGACX (24 years). MSHMX (7.16) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). MSHMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHMX: RGACX (250) vs MSHMX (1000000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.06 vs. MSHMX (-1.98). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 11.01 vs. MSHMX (-6.73).
| MSHMX | RGACX | MSHMX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.93 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 7.16 | 0.93 | 770% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.614 | -1.046 | -59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.76M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.98 | 2.06 | -96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.04 | 42.58 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.73 | 11.01 | -61% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 113.97 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement