Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSHMX vs RGACX
MSHMX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts MSHMX vs RGACX
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence I
Price$13.37
Change+$0.03 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.71M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$78.34
Change+$0.23 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
MSHMX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSHMX vs. RGACX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSHMX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. MSHMX (5.71M). MSHMX pays higher dividends than RGACX: MSHMX (2.22) vs RGACX (0.07). MSHMX was incepted earlier than RGACX: MSHMX (6 years) vs RGACX (24 years). MSHMX (7.16) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). MSHMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHMX: RGACX (250) vs MSHMX (1000000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.45 vs. MSHMX (2.77). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 20.43 vs. MSHMX (-4.56).
| MSHMX | RGACX | MSHMX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.93 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 7.16 | 0.93 | 770% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.699 | 8.821 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.71M | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.22 | 0.07 | 3,251% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.77 | 5.45 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.65 | 63.36 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.56 | 20.43 | -22% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 92.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement